Heat transfer compositions

ABSTRACT

A heat transfer composition comprising trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234ze(E)), difluoromethane (R-32) and 1,1-difluoroethane (R-152a).

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/287,880 filed on Oct. 14, 2008 which claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 0719989.6, filed Oct. 12, 2007 and Great Britain Patent Application Number 0814060.0, filed Aug. 1, 2008. The application also claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 1002625.0, filed on Feb. 16, 2010, International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002803, filed Dec. 2, 2009, International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002805 filed Dec. 2, 2009, International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002809, filed Dec. 2, 2009, and International Application No. PCT/GB2010/000774, filed 16 Apr. 2010.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to heat transfer compositions, and in particular to heat transfer compositions which may be suitable as replacements for existing refrigerants such as R-134a, R-152a, R-1234yf, R-22, R-410A, R-407A, R-407B, R-407C, R507 and R-404a.

The listing or discussion of a prior-published document or any background in the specification should not necessarily be taken as an acknowledgement that a document or background is part of the state of the art or is common general knowledge.

Mechanical refrigeration systems and related heat transfer devices such as heat pumps and air-conditioning systems are well known. In such systems, a refrigerant liquid evaporates at low pressure taking heat from the surrounding zone. The resulting vapor is then compressed and passed to a condenser where it condenses and gives off heat to a second zone, the condensate being returned through an expansion valve to the evaporator, so completing the cycle. Mechanical energy required for compressing the vapor and pumping the liquid is provided by, for example, an electric motor or an internal combustion engine.

In addition to having a suitable boiling point and a high latent heat of vaporization, the properties preferred in a refrigerant include low toxicity, non-flammability/non-corrosivity, high stability and freedom from objectionable odor. Other desirable properties are ready compressibility at pressures below 25 bars, low discharge temperature on compression, high refrigeration capacity, high efficiency (high coefficient of performance) and an evaporator pressure in excess of 1 bar at the desired evaporation temperature.

Dichlorodifluoromethane (refrigerant R-12) possesses a suitable combination of properties and was for many years the most widely used refrigerant. Due to international concern that fully and partially halogenated chlorofluorocarbons were damaging the earth's protective ozone layer, there was general agreement that their manufacture and use should be severely restricted and eventually phased out completely. The use of dichlorodifluoromethane was phased out in the 1990's.

Chlorodifluoromethane (R-22) was introduced as a replacement for R-12 because of its lower ozone depletion potential. Following concerns that R-22 is a potent greenhouse gas, its use is also being phased out.

Whilst heat transfer devices of the type to which the present invention relates are essentially closed systems, loss of refrigerant to the atmosphere can occur due to leakage during operation of the equipment or during maintenance procedures. It is important, therefore, to replace fully and partially halogenated chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants by materials having zero ozone depletion potentials.

In addition to the possibility of ozone depletion, it has been suggested that significant concentrations of halocarbon refrigerants in the atmosphere might contribute to global warming (the so-called greenhouse effect). It is desirable, therefore, to use refrigerants which have relatively short atmospheric lifetimes as a result of their ability to react with other atmospheric constituents such as hydroxyl radicals, or as a result of ready degradation through photolytic processes.

R-410A and R-407 refrigerants (including R-407A, R-407B and R-407C) have been introduced as a replacement refrigerant for R-22. However, R-22, R-410A and the R-407 refrigerants all have a high global warming potential (GWP, also known as greenhouse warming potential).

1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (refrigerant R-134a) was introduced as a replacement refrigerant for R-12. However, despite having no significant ozone depletion potential, R-134a has a GWP of 1300. It would be desirable to find replacements for R-134a that have a lower GWP.

R-152a (1,1-difluoroethane) has been identified as an alternative to R-134a. It is somewhat more efficient than R-134a and has a greenhouse warming potential of 120. However the flammability of R-152a is judged too high, for example to permit its safe use in mobile air conditioning systems. In particular it is believed that its lower flammable limit in air is too low, its flame speeds are too high, and its ignition energy is too low.

Thus there is a need to provide alternative refrigerants having improved properties such as low flammability. Fluorocarbon combustion chemistry is complex and unpredictable. It is not always the case that mixing a non-flammable fluorocarbon with a flammable fluorocarbon reduces the flammability of the fluid or reduces the range of flammable compositions in air. For example, the inventors have found that if non-flammable R-134a is mixed with flammable R-152a, the lower flammable limit of the mixture alters in a manner which is not predictable. The situation is rendered even more complex and less predictable if ternary or quaternary compositions are considered.

There is also a need to provide alternative refrigerants that may be used in existing devices such as refrigeration devices with little or no modification.

R-1234yf (2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene) has been identified as a candidate alternative refrigerant to replace R-134a in certain applications, notably in mobile air conditioning or heat pumping applications. Its GWP is about 4. R-1234yf is flammable but its flammability characteristics are generally regarded as acceptable for some applications including mobile air conditioning or heat pumping. In particular, when compared with R-152a, its lower flammable limit is higher, its minimum ignition energy is higher and the flame speed in air is significantly lower than that of R-152a.

The environmental impact of operating an air conditioning or refrigeration system, in terms of the emissions of greenhouse gases, should be considered with reference not only to the so-called “direct” GWP of the refrigerant, but also with reference to the so-called “indirect” emissions, meaning those emissions of carbon dioxide resulting from consumption of electricity or fuel to operate the system. Several metrics of this total GWP impact have been developed, including those known as Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI) analysis, or Life-Cycle Carbon Production (LCCP) analysis. Both of these measures include estimation of the effect of refrigerant GWP and energy efficiency on overall warming impact.

The energy efficiency and refrigeration capacity of R-1234yf have been found to be significantly lower than those of R-134a and in addition the fluid has been found to exhibit increased pressure drop in system pipework and heat exchangers. A consequence of this is that to use R-1234yf and achieve energy efficiency and cooling performance equivalent to R-134a, increased complexity of equipment and increased size of pipework is required, leading to an increase in indirect emissions associated with equipment. Furthermore, the production of R-1234yf is thought to be more complex and less efficient in its use of raw materials (fluorinated and chlorinated) than R-134a. So the adoption of R-1234yf to replace R-134a will consume more raw materials and result in more indirect emissions of greenhouse gases than does R-134a.

Some existing technologies designed for R-134a may not be able to accept even the reduced flammability of some heat transfer compositions (any composition having a GWP of less than 150 is believed to be flammable to some extent).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A principal object of the present invention is therefore to provide a heat transfer composition which is usable in its own right or suitable as a replacement for existing refrigeration usages which should have a reduced GWP, yet have a capacity and energy efficiency (which may be conveniently expressed as the “Coefficient of Performance”) ideally within 10% of the values, for example of those attained using existing refrigerants (e.g. R-134a, R-152a, R-1234yf, R-22, R-410A, R-407A, R-407B, R-407C, R507 and R-404a), and preferably within less than 10% (e.g. about 5%) of these values. It is known in the art that differences of this order between fluids are usually resolvable by redesign of equipment and system operational features. The composition should also ideally have reduced toxicity and acceptable flammability.

The subject invention addresses the above deficiencies by the provision of a heat transfer composition comprising trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234ze(E)), difluoromethane (R-32), and 1,1-difluoroethane (R-152a). This will be referred to hereinafter as the composition of the invention, unless otherwise stated.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flammability diagram for compositions of R-32, R-152a, and R-1234ze(E), with R-32 and R-152a having a 1:3 ratio.

FIG. 2 is a flammability diagram for compositions of R-32, R-152a, and R-1234ze(E), with R-32 and R-152a having a 1:2 ratio.

FIG. 3 is a flammability diagram for compositions of R-32, R-152a, and R-1234ze(E), with R-32 and R-152a having a 1:1 ratio.

FIG. 4 is a flammability diagram for composition of R-32, R-152a, R-134a, and R-1234ze(E), with R-32 and R-152a having a 1:1 ration and R-134a and R-1234ze(E) having a 1:2 ratio.

FIG. 5 is a flammability diagram of R-152a and R-134a.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention which may be embodied in other specific structures. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.

All of the chemicals herein described are commercially available. For example, the fluorochemicals may be obtained from Apollo Scientific (UK).

Typically, the compositions of the invention contain up to about 25% by weight R-32.

Conveniently, the compositions of the invention contain up to about 45% by weight R-152a.

In a preferred embodiment, the compositions of the invention contain from about 2 to about 25% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% by weight R-152a, and from about 60 to about 95% by weight (e.g. from about 70 to about 93%) R-1234ze(E).

Advantageously, the compositions of the invention contain from about 4 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 10% by weight R-152a, and from about 78 to about 91% by weight R-1234ze(E).

In a preferred aspect, the compositions of the invention contain from about 8 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 10% by weight R-152a, and from about 78 to about 87% by weight R-1234ze(E). Examples of such compositions are ternary blends containing:

about 10% R-32, about 5% R-152a and about 85% R-1234ze(E);

about 11% R-32, about 6% R-152a and about 83% R-1234ze(E);

about 9% R-32, about 6% R-152a and about 85% R-1234ze(E);

about 8% R-32, about 5% R-152a and about 87% R-1234ze(E); or

about 8% R-32, about 6% R-152a and about 86% R-1234ze(E).

Conveniently, the compositions of the invention contain from about 8 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 3 to about 7% by weight R-152a, and from about 81 to about 89% by weight R-1234ze(E).

In one aspect of the invention, the compositions of the invention contain from about 5 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 10 to about 45% by weight of R-152a, and from about 43 to about 85% by weight R-1234ze(E).

In a further preferred aspect, the compositions of the invention contain from about 5 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 10 to about 40% by weight of R-152a, and from about 48 to about 85% by weight R-1234ze(E).

In one embodiment, the compositions of the invention contain from about 5 to about 11% by weight R-32, from about 10 to about 35% by weight of R-152a, and from about 54 to about 85% by weight R-1234ze(E).

Advantageously, the compositions of the invention contain from about 5 to about 10% by weight R-32, from about 15 to about 30% by weight R-152a, and from about 60 to about 80% by weight R-1234ze(E).

As used herein, all % amounts mentioned in compositions herein, including in the claims, are by weight based on the total weight of the compositions, unless otherwise stated.

For the avoidance of doubt, it is to be understood that the stated upper and lower values for ranges of amounts of components in the compositions of the invention may be interchanged in any way, provided that the resulting ranges fall within the broadest scope of the invention. For example, a composition of the invention may comprise from about 5 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 5 or 10 to about 35% by weight of R-152a, and from about 53 to about 85 or 90% by weight R-1234ze(E).

The compositions of the invention containing R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a may consist essentially of (or consist of) these components.

By the term “consist essentially of”, we mean that the compositions of the invention contain substantially no other components, particularly no further (hydro)(fluoro)compounds (e.g. (hydro)(fluoro)alkanes or (hydro)(fluoro)alkenes) known to be used in heat transfer compositions. We include the term “consist of” within the meaning of “consist essentially of”. Thus, the compositions of the invention preferably are ternary blends of R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a.

For the avoidance of doubt, any of the compositions of the invention described herein, including those with specifically defined amounts of components, may consist essentially of (or consist of) the components defined in those compositions.

In a further aspect, the compositions of the invention containing R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a may additionally comprise 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (R-134a). The R-134a typically is included to reduce the flammability of the compositions of the invention.

If R-134a is present, then the resulting compositions typically contain up to about 50% by weight R-134a, preferably from about 25% to about 45% by weight R-134a. The remainder of the composition will contain R32, R152a and R-1234ze(E), suitably in similar preferred proportions as described hereinbefore.

Suitable blends of R32, R152a, R-1234ze(E) and R-134a contain from about 2 to about 15% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% by weight R-152a, from about 25 to about 50% R-134a, and from about 5 to about 70% by weight R-1234ze(E).

For example, the composition of the invention may contain from about 4 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 35% by weight R-152a, from about 25 to about 45% R-134a, and the balance R-1234ze(E).

If the proportion of R-134a in the composition is about 25% by weight, then the remainder of the composition typically contains from about 3 to about 12% (preferably from about 4 to about 10%) by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% (preferably from about 5 to about 40%) by weight R-152a, and from about 20 to about 70% (preferably from about 25 to about 65%) by weight R-1234ze(E).

If the proportion of R-134a in the composition is about 35% by weight, then the remainder of the composition typically contains from about 3 to about 11% (preferably from about 4 to about 10%) by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% (preferably from about 5 to about 40%) by weight R-152a, and from about 10 to about 60% (preferably from about 15 to about 55%) by weight R-1234ze(E).

If the proportion of R-134a in the composition is about 45% by weight, then the remainder of the composition typically contains from about 3 to about 10% (preferably from about 3 to about 8%) by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% (preferably from about 5 to about 40%) by weight R-152a, and from about 5 to about 50% (preferably from about 15 to about 45%) by weight R-1234ze(E).

Preferably, the compositions of the invention which contain R-134a are non-flammable at a test temperature of 60° C. using the ASHRAE 34 methodology. Advantageously, the mixtures of vapor that exist in equilibrium with the compositions of the invention at any temperature between about −20° C. and 60° C. are also non-flammable.

Compositions according to the invention conveniently comprise substantially no R-1225 (pentafluoropropene), conveniently substantially no R-1225ye (1,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropene) or R-1225zc (1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoropropene), which compounds may have associated toxicity issues.

By “substantially no”, we include the meaning that the compositions of the invention contain 0.5% by weight or less of the stated component, preferably 0.1% or less, based on the total weight of the composition.

The compositions of the invention may contain substantially no:

-   (i) 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234yf), -   (ii) cis-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234ze(Z)), and/or -   (iii) 3,3,3-trifluoropropene (R-1243zf).

The compositions of the invention have zero ozone depletion potential.

Preferably, the compositions of the invention (e.g. those that are suitable refrigerant replacements for R-134a, R-1234yf or R-152a) have a GWP that is less than 1300, preferably less than 1000, more preferably less than 500, 400, 300 or 200, especially less than 150 or 100, even less than 50 in some cases. Unless otherwise stated, IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) TAR (Third Assessment Report) values of GWP have been used herein.

Advantageously, the compositions are of reduced flammability hazard when compared to the individual flammable components of the compositions, e.g. R-32 or R-152a. Preferably, the compositions are of reduced flammability hazard when compared to R-1234yf.

In one aspect, the compositions have one or more of (a) a higher lower flammable limit; (b) a higher ignition energy; or (c) a lower burning velocity compared to R-32, R-152a or R-1234yf. In a preferred embodiment, the compositions of the invention are non-flammable. Advantageously, the mixtures of vapor that exist in equilibrium with the compositions of the invention at any temperature between about −20° C. and 60° C. are also non-flammable.

Flammability may be determined in accordance with ASHRAE Standard 34 incorporating the ASTM Standard E-681 with test methodology as per Addendum 34p dated 2004, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.

In some applications it may not be necessary for the formulation to be classed as non-flammable by the ASHRAE 34 methodology; it is possible to develop fluids whose flammability limits will be sufficiently reduced in air to render them safe for use in the application, for example if it is physically not possible to make a flammable mixture by leaking the refrigeration equipment charge into the surrounds. We have found that the effect of adding further refrigerants R-32 and R-1234ze(E) to flammable refrigerant R-152a is to modify the flammability in mixtures with air in this manner.

It is known that the flammability of mixtures of hydrofluorocarbons, (HFCs) or hydrofluorocarbons plus hydrofluoro-olefins, is related to the proportion of carbon-fluorine bonds relative to carbon-hydrogen bonds.

This can be expressed as the ratio R=F/(F+H) where, on a molar basis, F represents the total number of fluorine atoms and H represents the total number of hydrogen atoms in the composition. This is referred to herein as the fluorine ratio, unless otherwise stated.

For example, Takizawa et al, Reaction Stoichiometry for Combustion of Fluoroethane Blends, ASHRAE Transactions 112(2) 2006 (which is incorporated herein by reference), shows there exists a near-linear relationship between this ratio and the flame speed of mixtures comprising R-152a, with increasing fluorine ratio resulting in lower flame speeds. The data in this reference teach that the fluorine ratio needs to be greater than about 0.65 for the flame speed to drop to zero, in other words, for the mixture to be non-flammable.

Similarly, Minor et al (Du Pont Patent Application WO2007/053697) provide teaching on the flammability of many hydrofluoroolefins, showing that such compounds could be expected to be non-flammable if the fluorine ratio is greater than about 0.7.

It may be expected on the basis of the art, therefore, that mixtures comprising R-32 (fluorine ratio 0.5), R-152a (fluorine ratio 0.33) and R-1234ze(E) (fluorine ratio 0.67) would be flammable except for limited compositional ranges comprising almost 100% R-1234ze(E), since any amount of R-152a added to the olefin would reduce the fluorine ratio of the mixture below 0.67.

Surprisingly, we have found this not to be the case. In particular, we have found that mixtures comprising R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) having a fluorine ratio of less than 0.7 exist that are non-flammable at 23° C. As shown in the examples hereinafter, certain mixtures of R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) are non-flammable even down to fluorine ratios of about 0.57.

Moreover, again as demonstrated in the examples hereinafter, we have further identified mixtures of R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) having a lower flammable limit in air of 7% v/v or higher (thereby making them safe to use in many applications), and having a fluorine ratio as low as about 0.46. This is especially surprising given that flammable 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234yf) has a fluorine ratio of 0.67 and a measured lower flammable limit in air at 23° C. of 6 to 6.5% v/v.

In one embodiment, the compositions of the invention have a fluorine ratio of from about 0.42 to about 0.7, such as from about 0.44 to about 0.67, for example from about 0.57 to about 0.65. For the avoidance of doubt, it is to be understood that the upper and lower values of these fluorine ratio ranges may be interchanged in any way, provided that the resulting ranges fall within the broadest scope of the invention.

By producing low- or non-flammable R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) blends containing unexpectedly low amounts of R-1234ze(E), the amounts of R-32 and/or R-152a in such compositions are increased. This is believed to result in heat transfer compositions exhibiting increased cooling capacity, decreased temperature glide and/or decreased pressure drop, compared to equivalent compositions containing higher amounts (e.g. almost 100%) R-1234ze(E).

Thus, the compositions of the invention exhibit a completely unexpected combination of low-/non-flammability, low GWP and improved refrigeration performance properties. Some of these refrigeration performance properties are explained in more detail below.

Temperature glide, which can be thought of as the difference between bubble point and dew point temperatures of a zeotropic (non-azeotropic) mixture at constant pressure, is a characteristic of a refrigerant; if it is desired to replace a fluid with a mixture then it is often preferable to have similar or reduced glide in the alternative fluid. In an embodiment, the compositions of the invention are zeotropic.

In the evaporator of a vapor-compression cycle the effective temperature glide is less than the difference between dew and bubble point temperatures, since the working fluid enters the evaporator as a two-phase mixture of liquid and vapor intermediate between the bubble and dew points.

Conveniently, the temperature glide (in the evaporator) of the compositions of the invention is less than about 10K, preferably less than about 5K.

Advantageously, the volumetric refrigeration capacity of the compositions of the invention is at least 85% of the existing refrigerant fluid it is replacing, preferably at least 90% or even at least 95%.

The compositions of the invention typically have a volumetric refrigeration capacity that is at least 90% of that of R-1234yf. Preferably, the compositions of the invention have a volumetric refrigeration capacity that is at least 95% of that of R-1234yf, for example from about 95% to about 120% of that of R-1234yf.

In one embodiment, the cycle efficiency (Coefficient of Performance, COP) of the compositions of the invention is within about 5% or even better than the existing refrigerant fluid it is replacing

Conveniently, the compressor discharge temperature of the compositions of the invention is within about 15K of the existing refrigerant fluid it is replacing, preferably about 10K or even about 5K.

The compositions of the invention preferably have energy efficiency at least 95% (preferably at least 98%) of R-134a under equivalent conditions, while having reduced or equivalent pressure drop characteristics and cooling capacity at 95% or higher of R-134a values. Advantageously the compositions have higher energy efficiency and lower pressure drop characteristics than R-134a under equivalent conditions. The compositions also advantageously have better energy efficiency and pressure drop characteristics than R-1234yf alone.

The heat transfer compositions of the invention are suitable for use in existing designs of equipment, and are compatible with all classes of lubricant currently used with established HFC refrigerants. They may be optionally stabilized or compatibilized with mineral oils by the use of appropriate additives.

Preferably, when used in heat transfer equipment, the composition of the invention is combined with a lubricant.

Conveniently, the lubricant is selected from the group consisting of mineral oil, silicone oil, polyalkyl benzenes (PABs), polyol esters (POEs), polyalkylene glycols (PAGs), polyalkylene glycol esters (PAG esters), polyvinyl ethers (PVEs), poly (alpha-olefins) and combinations thereof.

Advantageously, the lubricant further comprises a stabilizer.

Preferably, the stabilizer is selected from the group consisting of diene-based compounds, phosphates, phenol compounds and epoxides, and mixtures thereof.

Conveniently, the composition of the invention may be combined with a flame retardant.

Advantageously, the flame retardant is selected from the group consisting of tri-(2-chloroethyl)-phosphate, (chloropropyl) phosphate, tri-(2,3-dibromopropyl)-phosphate, tri-(1,3-dichloropropyl)-phosphate, diammonium phosphate, various halogenated aromatic compounds, antimony oxide, aluminum trihydrate, polyvinyl chloride, a fluorinated iodocarbon, a fluorinated bromocarbon, trifluoro iodomethane, perfluoroalkyl amines, bromo-fluoroalkyl amines and mixtures thereof.

Preferably, the heat transfer composition is a refrigerant composition.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a heat transfer device comprising a composition of the invention.

Preferably, the heat transfer device is a refrigeration device.

Conveniently, the heat transfer device is selected from group consisting of automotive air conditioning systems, residential air conditioning systems, commercial air conditioning systems, residential refrigerator systems, residential freezer systems, commercial refrigerator systems, commercial freezer systems, chiller air conditioning systems, chiller refrigeration systems, and commercial or residential heat pump systems. Preferably, the heat transfer device is a refrigeration device or an air-conditioning system.

Advantageously, the heat transfer device contains a centrifugal-type compressor.

The invention also provides the use of a composition of the invention in a heat transfer device as herein described.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a blowing agent comprising a composition of the invention.

According to another aspect of the invention; there is provided a foamable composition comprising one or more components capable of forming foam and a composition of the invention.

Preferably, the one or more components capable of forming foam are selected from polyurethanes, thermoplastic polymers and resins, such as polystyrene, and epoxy resins.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a foam obtainable from the foamable composition of the invention.

Preferably the foam comprises a composition of the invention.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a sprayable composition comprising a material to be sprayed and a propellant comprising a composition of the invention.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for cooling an article which comprises condensing a composition of the invention and thereafter evaporating said composition in the vicinity of the article to be cooled.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for heating an article which comprises condensing a composition of the invention in the vicinity of the article to be heated and thereafter evaporating said composition.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for extracting a substance from biomass comprising contacting the biomass with a solvent comprising a composition of the invention, and separating the substance from the solvent.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of cleaning an article comprising contacting the article with a solvent comprising a composition of the invention.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for extracting a material from an aqueous solution comprising contacting the aqueous solution with a solvent comprising a composition of the invention, and separating the material from the solvent.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for extracting a material from a particulate solid matrix comprising contacting the particulate solid matrix with a solvent comprising a composition of the invention, and separating the material from the solvent.

According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a mechanical power generation device containing a composition of the invention.

Preferably, the mechanical power generation device is adapted to use a Rankine Cycle or modification thereof to generate work from heat.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of retrofitting a heat transfer device comprising the step of removing an existing heat transfer fluid, and introducing a composition of the invention. Preferably, the heat transfer device is a refrigeration device or (a static) air conditioning system. Advantageously, the method further comprises the step of obtaining an allocation of greenhouse gas (e.g. carbon dioxide) emission credit.

In accordance with the retrofitting method described above, an existing heat transfer fluid can be fully removed from the heat transfer device before introducing a composition of the invention. An existing heat transfer fluid can also be partially removed from a heat transfer device, followed by introducing a composition of the invention.

In another embodiment wherein the existing heat transfer fluid is R-134a, and the composition of the invention contains R134a, R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a (and optional components such as a lubricant, a stabilizer or an additional flame retardant), R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a, etc, can be added to the R-134a in the heat transfer device, thereby forming the compositions of the invention, and the heat transfer device of the invention, in situ. Some of the existing R-134a may be removed from the heat transfer device prior to adding the R-1234ze(E), R-32, R-152a, etc, to facilitate providing the components of the compositions of the invention in the desired proportions.

Thus, the invention provides a method for preparing a composition and/or heat transfer device of the invention comprising introducing R-1234ze(E), R-32, and R-152a, and optional components such as a lubricant, a stabilizer or an additional flame retardant, into a heat transfer device containing an existing heat transfer fluid which is R-134a. Optionally, at least some of the R-134a is removed from the heat transfer device before introducing the R-1234ze(E), R-32, R-152a, etc.

Of course, the compositions of the invention may also be prepared simply by mixing the R-1234ze(E), R-32, R-152a, optionally R-134a (and optional components such as a lubricant, a stabilizer or an additional flame retardant) in the desired proportions. The compositions can then be added to a heat transfer device (or used in any other way as defined herein) that does not contain R-134a or any other existing heat transfer fluid, such as a device from which R-134a or any other existing heat transfer fluid have been removed.

In a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for reducing the environmental impact arising from operation of a product comprising an existing compound or composition, the method comprising replacing at least partially the existing compound or composition with a composition of the invention. Preferably, this method comprises the step of obtaining an allocation of greenhouse gas emission credit.

By environmental impact we include the generation and emission of greenhouse warming gases through operation of the product.

As mentioned above, this environmental impact can be considered as including not only those emissions of compounds or compositions having a significant environmental impact from leakage or other losses, but also including the emission of carbon dioxide arising from the energy consumed by the device over its working life. Such environmental impact may be quantified by the measure known as Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI). This measure has been used in quantification of the environmental impact of certain stationary refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, including for example supermarket refrigeration systems (see, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total equivalent warming imp act).

The environmental impact may further be considered as including the emissions of greenhouse gases arising from the synthesis and manufacture of the compounds or compositions. In this case the manufacturing emissions are added to the energy consumption and direct loss effects to yield the measure known as Life-Cycle Carbon Production (LCCP, see for example http://www.sae.org/events/aars/presentations/2007papasavv a.pdf). The use of LCCP is common in assessing environmental impact of automotive air conditioning systems.

Emission credit(s) are awarded for reducing pollutant emissions that contribute to global warming and may, for example, be banked, traded or sold. They are conventionally expressed in the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide. Thus if the emission of 1 kg of R-134a is avoided then an emission credit of 1×1300=1300 kg CO₂ equivalent may be awarded.

In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method for generating greenhouse gas emission credit(s) comprising (i) replacing an existing compound or composition with a composition of the invention, wherein the composition of the invention has a lower GWP than the existing compound or composition; and (ii) obtaining greenhouse gas emission credit for said replacing step.

In a preferred embodiment, the use of the composition of the invention results in the equipment having a lower Total Equivalent Warming Impact, and/or a lower Life-Cycle Carbon Production than that which would be attained by use of the existing compound or composition.

These methods may be carried out on any suitable product, for example in the fields of air-conditioning, refrigeration (e.g. low and medium temperature refrigeration), heat transfer, blowing agents, aerosols or sprayable propellants, gaseous dielectrics, cryosurgery, veterinary procedures, dental procedures, fire extinguishing, flame suppression, solvents (e.g. carriers for flavorings and fragrances), cleaners, air horns, pellet guns, topical anesthetics, and expansion applications. Preferably, the field is air-conditioning or refrigeration.

Examples of suitable products include a heat transfer devices, blowing agents, foamable compositions, sprayable compositions, solvents and mechanical power generation devices. In a preferred embodiment, the product is a heat transfer device, such as a refrigeration device or an air-conditioning unit.

The existing compound or composition has an environmental impact as measured by GWP and/or TEWI and/or LCCP that is higher than the composition of the invention which replaces it. The existing compound or composition may comprise a fluorocarbon compound, such as a perfluoro-, hydrofluoro-, chlorofluoro- or hydrochlorofluoro-carbon compound or it may comprise a fluorinated olefin.

Preferably, the existing compound or composition is a heat transfer compound or composition such as a refrigerant. Examples of refrigerants that may be replaced include R-134a, R-152a, R-1234yf, R-410A, R-407A, R-407B, R-407C, R507, R-22 and R-404A. The compositions of the invention are particularly suited as replacements for R-134a, R-152a or R-1234yf.

Any amount of the existing compound or composition may be replaced so as to reduce the environmental impact. This may depend on the environmental impact of the existing compound or composition being replaced and the environmental impact of the replacement composition of the invention. Preferably, the existing compound or composition in the product is fully replaced by the composition of the invention.

The invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES Flammability

The flammability of certain compositions of the invention in air at atmospheric pressure and controlled humidity was studied in a test flask apparatus as described by the methodology of ASHRAE standard 34. The test temperature used was 23° C.; the humidity was controlled to be 50% relative to a standard temperature of 77° F. (25° C.). The diluent used was R-1234ze(E), which was found to be non flammable under these test conditions. The fuels used were mixtures of R-32 and R-152a. Three fuel compositions were tested and the molar proportion of R32 to R-152a was varied in each fuel. The three molar ratios of R32 to R-152a used were 1:1; 1:2 and 1:3. The fuel and diluent gases were subjected to vacuum purging of the cylinder to remove dissolved air or other inert gases prior to testing. The results of these tests are shown in FIGS. 1 to 3. In these triangular charts the vertices represent pure fuel, air and diluent. The flammable region was identified by varying the relative proportions of fuel, air and diluent and is plotted as the hatched line in each chart.

Using the above methodology we have found the following compositions to be non-flammable at 23° C. (associated fluorine ratios are also shown).

Non flammable Fluorine mixture composition ratio R = Composition on a (volumetric basis) F/(F + H) weight/weight basis R-32 20%, R-152a 0.571 R-32 11% R-152a 14% R- 20%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 75% 60% R-32 11.7%, R-152a 0.572 R-32 6% R-152a 16% R- 23.3%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 78% 65% R-32 8.3%, R-152a 0.572 R-32 4% R-152a 17% R- 24.8%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 79% 67% R-32 10%, R-152a 0.586 R-32 5% R-152a 13% R- 20%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 82% 70% R-32 8%, R-152a 0.600 R-32 4% R-152a 11% R- 17%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 85% 75% R-32 17.5%, R-152a 0.584 R-32 10% R-152a 12% R- 17.5%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 78% 65% R-32 15%, R-152a 0.596 R-32 8% R-152a 10% R- 15%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 82% 70% R-32 10%, R-152a 0.621 R-32 5% R-152a 6% R- 10%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 89% 80% R-32 7.5%, R-152a 0.581 R-32 4% R-152a 15% R- 22.5%, R-1234ze (E) 1234ze (E) 81% 70%

It can be seen that non flammable mixtures comprising R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) can be created if the fluorine ratio of the mixture is greater than about 0.57.

We have further identified the following mixtures of R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) having a lower flammable limit in air of 7% v/v.

Mixture having LFL Fluorine of 7% v/v ratio R = Composition on a (volumetric basis) F/(F + H) weight/weight basis R-32 47.5%, R-152a 0.416 R-32 40%, R-152a 51%, 47.5%, R-1234ze (E) R-1234ze (E) 9% 5% R-32 28%, R-152a 0.426 R-32 21% R-152a 53% 56%, R-1234ze (E) R-1234ze (E) 26% 16% R-32 19%, R-152a 0.441 R-32 13% R-152a 50% 57%, R-1234ze (E) R-1234ze (E) 37% 24%

The above table shows that we have found that it is possible to generate mixtures comprising R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E) having an LFL of 7% v/v or higher if the fluorine ratio of the mixture is greater than about 0.41.

By way of comparison, the lower flammable limit of R-1234yf in air in the same test apparatus and at the same temperature was found to be variously between 6.0 and 6.5% v/v in several repeated tests.

A similar flammability experiment was then carried out in which the fuel used was an equimolar mixture of R-32 and R-152a and the diluent was a mixture of R-134a and R-1234ze(E) in the molar proportions 1:2. The ASTM flammability apparatus was used to determine the flammable region, which is included as FIG. 4.

The minimum proportion of diluent required to ensure that mixtures of fuel+diluent with air are non flammable was found to be about 59% v/v. The non flammable composition of 59% v/v diluent and 41% v/v fuel corresponds to an overall composition of R-32 20.5%; R-152a 20.5%; R-134a 19.7% and R-1234ze(E) 39.3% (all volumetric). This composition has a fluorine ratio of 0.569, consistent with the findings of the previous experiments for determination of a non-flammable composition.

It was concluded that quaternary mixtures of these fluids could be expected to be non-flammable at 23° C. if the fluorine ratio was greater than 0.57. Furthermore, it was found that any combination of the R-134a/R-1234ze(E) diluent and the R-32/R-152a fuel mix would have a lower flammable limit of at least 7% v/v, corresponding to a fluorine ratio of 0.4 or greater.

A further flammability experiment was carried out in which the fuel used was R-152a and the diluent was R-134a. The ASTM flammability apparatus was used to determine the flammable region, which is included as FIG. 5. This figure shows a completely different shape and unexpectedly broad region of flammability, indicating the unpredictable nature of such flammability tests.

The flammability of certain compositions of the invention in air at atmospheric pressure and controlled humidity was studied in a flame tube test as follows.

The test vessel was an upright glass cylinder having a diameter of 2 inches. The ignition electrodes were placed 60 mm above the bottom of the cylinder. The cylinder was fitted with a pressure-release opening. The apparatus was shielded to restrict any explosion damage. A standing induction spark of 0.5 second duration was used as the ignition source.

The test was performed at 23° C. (see below). A known concentration of fuel in air was introduced into the glass cylinder. A spark was passed through the mixture and it was observed whether or not a flame detached itself from the ignition source and propagated independently. The gas concentration was increased in steps of 1% vol. until ignition occurred (if at all). The results are shown below (all compositions are v/v basis unless otherwise stated).

Fuel Temp (° C.) Humidity Results R32/R152a/R1234ze 23 50% RH/23° C. LFL 10% UFL 42/7/51 19% (about 26/5/69 w/w) R32/R152a/R1234ze 23 50% RH/23° C. LFL 9% UFL 19/9/72 16% (about 10/6/84 w/w)

Again, the LFL of the tested compositions was found to be considerably higher (i.e. less flammable) than R-1234yf under the same conditions (R1234yf was tested in the same apparatus and found to exhibit lower flammable limit of 6% v/v and upper flammable limit of 15% v/v).

Performance of R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends

The performance of selected ternary compositions of the invention was estimated using a thermodynamic property model in conjunction with an idealised vapour compression cycle. The thermodynamic model used the Peng Robinson equation of state to represent vapour phase properties and vapour-liquid equilibrium of the mixtures, together with a polynomial correlation of the variation of ideal gas enthalpy of each component of the mixtures with temperature. The principles behind use of this equation of state to model thermodynamic properties and vapour liquid equilibrium are explained more fully in The Properties of Gases and Liquids (5^(th) edition) by B E Poling, J M Prausnitz and J M O'Connell pub. McGraw Hill 2000, in particular Chapters 4 and 8 (which is incorporated herein by reference).

The basic property data required to use this model were: critical temperature and critical pressure; vapour pressure and the related property of Pitzer acentric factor; ideal gas enthalpy, and measured vapour liquid equilibrium data for the binary systems R-32/R-152a; R-152a/R-1234ze(E) and R-32/R1234ze(E).

The basic property data (critical properties, acentric factor, vapour pressure and ideal gas enthalpy) for R-32 and R-152a were taken from the NIST REFPROP Version 8.0 software, which is incorporated herein by reference. The critical point and vapour pressure for R-1234ze(E) were measured experimentally. The ideal gas enthalpy for R-1234ze(E) over a range of temperatures was estimated using the molecular modelling software Hyperchem 7.5, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Vapour liquid equilibrium data for the binary mixtures was regressed to the Peng Robinson equation using a binary interaction constant incorporated into van der Waal's mixing rules as follows. For the R-32 with R-152a binary pair, data was taken from Lee et al. J. Chem. Eng Data 1999 (44) 190-192 (incorporated herein by reference). Vapour liquid equilibrium data for R-152a with R-1234ze(E) were taken from WO2006/094303 page 69 (incorporated herein by reference) and the interaction constant was fitted to represent the azeotropic composition implied by these data at −25° C. No vapour liquid equilibrium data were available for R-32 with R-1234ze(E) so the interaction constant for this pair was set to zero.

The refrigeration performance of selected ternary compositions of the invention was modelled using the following cycle conditions.

Condensing temperature (° C.) 60 Evaporating temperature (° C.) 0 Subcool (K) 5 Superheat (K) 5 Suction temperature (° C.) 15 Isentropic efficiency 65% Clearance ratio  4% Duty (kW) 6 Suction line diameter (mm) 16.2

The refrigeration performance data of these compositions are set out in Tables 1 to 10, which are found in the attached Appendix.

The data shows that compositions exhibiting reduced flammability (or non-flammability) when compared to R-1234yf could be prepared having close or superior cooling capacity, significantly enhanced energy efficiency and reduced pressure drop. The energy efficiency gain implied in use of the compositions of the invention as compared to R-1234yf will result in the air conditioning system exhibiting a lower overall total equivalent warming impact (or equivalently lower LCCP) as well as reduced power consumption, even though the direct GWP of the compositions is somewhat higher than for R-1234yf.

In addition it was found that where compositions exhibited equivalent cooling capacity to R-1234yf, the estimated suction line pressure drop was significantly lower than for R-1234yf and close to the values that would be expected if using R-134a. This is significant for automotive air conditioning systems, where the suction gas line represents a significant point of efficiency loss. It is known that R-1234yf requires a larger diameter suction hose in an automotive system than does R-134a, which is inconvenient for layout of the system. The compositions of the invention offer the opportunity to use a smaller suction line size in such systems or alternatively to realise further gains in system energy efficiency if the same line size is used.

Performance of R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R134a Blends

The refrigeration performance of selected quaternary compositions of the invention was modelled using the same model and cycle conditions as set out above in relation to the ternary compositions of the invention. The refrigeration performance data of these compositions are set out in tables 11 to 37, which are found in the attached Appendix.

Wholly non-flammable fluids having performance close to R134a are especially desired, the data shows that it is possible to have capacity, COP and pressure drop close to those of R134a whilst achieving significant reduction in GWP (of the order of 50% reduction or more compared to pure R134a) by use of combinations of R-32, R152a, R-134a and R-1234ze(E).

The performance of a composition containing 10% by weight R-32, 5% by weight R-152a and 85% by weight R-1234ze(E) was tested in an automotive air conditioning system suitable for use with R-134a. This composition is denoted by “Blend” in the results shown below.

The test conditions used were as described in SAE Standard J2765, which is incorporated herein by reference. These conditions are summarized below.

Ambient air condition 35° C. and 40% relative humidity (RH)

Air Off Temperature from Evaporator Controlled to 3° C.

Compressor displacement variable 0-175 cc per stroke

Conventional R-134a expansion valve was replaced with an electronic expansion valve to allow for ease of superheat adjustment

System used without internal heat exchanger and with equivalent superheat at evaporator exit for all fluids

The results are shown below, in which I, L, M and H refer to idle, low, medium and high speed, and wherein 35 and 45 refer to the ambient temperature in ° C.

Relative to Measured cooling capacity (kW) R-134a Test point R134a Blend Blend I35 4.67 4.65 100% L35 5.86 5.79  99% M35 6.43 6.18  96% H35 6.65 6.55  98% I45 3.81 3.76  99% L45 4.76 4.75 100% M45 5.2  5.17  99% H45 5.41 5.41 100%

The Blend composition of the invention represents a good match of capacity and efficiency for R-134a in an R-134a air-conditioning system across a range of conditions.

Measured COP Energy (expressed relative Efficiency as COP) to R-134a Test point R134a Blend Blend I35 2.87 2.85  99% L35 1.98 1.98 100% M35 1.79 1.75  98% H35 1.4  1.37  98% I45 2.3  2.32 101% L45 1.64 1.69 103% M45 1.48 1.5  101% H45 1.18 1.19 101%

Miscibility Data

The miscibility of a composition of the invention containing about 10% by weight R-32, about 5% by weight R-152a and about 85% by weight R-1234ze(E) (referred to below as Blend) was tested with the polyalkylene glycol (PAG) lubricants ND8 and YN12. The results of these experiments were compared to the miscibility of pure R-1234yf with the same PAGs. The results are shown below.

Miscibility Results for Blend with 32H Lubricant Concentration Temp wt % deg C. 4 7 10 20 30 50 −20 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible −10 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 0 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 10 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 20 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 30 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 40 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 50 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 60 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 70 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 80 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible

Miscibility Results for 1234yf with 32H Lubricant Concentration Temp wt % deg C. 4 7 10 20 30 50 −20 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible −10 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 0 miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible miscible 10 slightly slightly miscible miscible miscible miscible opaque opaque 20 slightly slightly miscible miscible miscible miscible opaque opaque 30 slightly slightly miscible miscible miscible miscible opaque opaque 40 slightly slightly miscible miscible miscible miscible opaque opaque 50 slightly slightly miscible miscible slightly slightly opaque opaque opaque opaque 60 slightly slightly miscible miscible slightly slightly opaque opaque opaque opaque 70 slightly slightly miscible miscible slightly slightly opaque opaque opaque opaque 80 Miscible slightly miscible Opaque 2 Opaque 2 Opaque opaque layers layers

Miscibility Results for Blend with YN12 Temp Lubricant Concentration deg wt % C. 4 7 10 20 30 50 −20 Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque −10 Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque Opaque 0 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly opaque opaque opaque opaque opaque opaque 10 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 20 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 25 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 30 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 35 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 40 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 45 Slightly Slightly Slightly Slightly very very opaque opaque opaque opaque Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 50 Miscible Miscible Miscible Miscible very very Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 60 Miscible Miscible Miscible Miscible very very Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 70 Miscible Miscible Miscible opaque 2 very very layers Slightly Slightly opaque opaque 80 2 layers 2 layers 2 layers 2 layers 2 layers very Slightly opaque

Miscibility Results for 1234yf with YN12 Lubricant Concentration Temperature wt % deg C. 4 7 10 20 30 50 −20 opaque opaque 2 layers opaque 2 layers 2 layers −10 slightly slightly 2 layers opaque 2 layers 2 opaque opaque layers 0 slightly opaque 2 layers opaque opaque opaque opaque 10 slightly opaque 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 opaque opaque layers opaque layers opaque opaque 20 opaque slightly 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 opaque 2 opaque layers opaque layers layers opaque 30 opaque opaque 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 opaque layers opaque layers opaque 40 clear 2 clear 2 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 layers layers clear layers clear layers clear 50 clear 2 clear 2 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 layers layers clear layers clear layers clear 60 clear 2 clear 2 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 layers layers clear layers clear layers clear 70 clear 2 clear 2 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 layers layers clear layers clear layers clear 80 clear 2 clear 2 2 layers 2 2 layers 2 layers layers clear layers clear layers clear

The results show that the compositions of the invention have improved miscibility with lubricants compared to the pure fluid R-1234yf.

In summary, the invention provides new compositions that exhibit a surprising combination of advantageous properties including good refrigeration performance, low flammability, low GWP, and/or miscibility with lubricants compared to existing refrigerants such as R-134a and the proposed refrigerant R-1234yf.

The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.

TABLE 1 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 2% R32 R32 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 93 88 83 78 73 68 63 58 53 Comparative Calculation data 2/10/ 2/15/ 2/20/ 2/25/ 2/30/ 2/35/ 2/40/ 2/45/ results 134a R1234yf 2/5/93 88 83 78 73 68 63 58 53 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.76 5.73 5.71 5.69 5.67 5.65 5.64 5.63 5.63 Volumetric 83.6% 84.7% 83.0% 83.2% 83.5% 83.7% 83.9% 84.1% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% efficiency Condenser glide 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 (K) Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −0.4 −0.5 −0.5 −0.4 −0.4 −0.4 −0.3 −0.3 −0.3 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.2 54.2 54.3 54.4 54.4 54.5 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 13.45 13.79 14.09 14.35 14.58 14.78 14.95 15.10 15.22 Evaporator P 2.92 3.14 2.33 2.40 2.47 2.52 2.57 2.62 2.65 2.68 2.70 (bar) Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 116.5 120.9 125.4 129.9 134.6 139.4 144.3 149.3 154.4 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T 99.15 92.88 90.5 92.1 93.7 95.2 96.7 98.2 99.7 101.2 102.7 (° C.) Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 185.4 178.6 172.3 166.2 160.5 155.0 149.7 144.7 139.9 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 16.7 16.1 15.6 15.2 14.8 14.5 14.3 14.0 13.8 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric 1641 1540 1297 1342 1383 1421 1456 1487 1516 1541 1564 capacity (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1262 1186 1120 1061 1009 962 920 882 847 (kPa/m) GWP 23 28 34 40 45 51 57 62 68 (TAR basis) Fluorine ratio R = 0.634 0.609 0.585 0.563 0.542 0.522 0.503 0.486 0.469 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0% 84.2% 87.1% 89.8% 92.3% 94.5% 96.6% 98.4% 100.1% 101.6% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.6% 107.1% 107.5% 107.9% 108.4% 108.8% 109.2% 109.6% Relative pressure 76.9% 100.0% 101.9% 95.8% 90.4% 85.7% 81.4% 77.7% 74.3% 71.2% 68.4% drop

TABLE 2 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 4% R32 R32 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 91 86 81 76 71 66 61 56 51 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 4/5/91 4/10/86 4/15/81 4/20/76 4/25/71 4/30/66 4/35/61 4/40/56 4/45/51 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.79 5.75 5.72 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.0%  83.3%  83.5%  83.8%  84.0%  84.2%  84.4%  84.6%  84.7% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 53.5 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.8 53.9 54.0 54.1 54.1 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 14.10 14.42 14.70 14.94 15.15 15.33 15.48 15.61 15.71 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.44 2.51 2.57 2.62 2.67 2.71 2.74 2.77 2.79 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 119.7 124.1 128.5 133.0 137.7 142.4 147.3 152.3 157.5 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 92.5 94.0 95.6 97.0 98.5 100.0 101.5 102.9 104.4 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 180.4 174.1 168.1 162.4 156.9 151.6 146.6 141.8 137.1 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 15.8 15.4 14.9 14.6 14.3 14.0 13.7 13.5 13.3 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1363 1407 1446 1483 1516 1546 1573 1597 1619 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1177 1110 1052 999 953 911 873 838 806 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 33 39 45 51 56 62 68 73 79 Fluorine ratio R = 0.630 0.605 0.581 0.559 0.539 0.519 0.501 0.483 0.467 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  88.5%  91.3%  93.9%  96.3%  98.4% 100.4% 102.2% 103.7% 105.2% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.4% 106.8% 107.2% 107.7% 108.1% 108.5% 108.9% 109.3% 109.7% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  95.0%  89.6%  84.9%  80.7%  76.9%  73.5%  70.4%  67.6%  65.1% drop

TABLE 3 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 5% R32 R32 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 5/5/90 5/10/85 5/15/80 5/20/75 5/25/70 5/30/65 5/35/60 5/40/55 5/45/50 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.79 5.76 5.73 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.0%  83.3%  83.6%  83.8%  84.1%  84.3%  84.4%  84.6%  84.8% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 −0.6 −0.6 −0.6 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.8 53.9 54.0 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 14.43 14.73 15.00 15.23 15.43 15.60 15.75 15.87 15.96 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.49 2.56 2.62 2.67 2.72 2.76 2.79 2.81 2.83 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 121.3 125.6 130.0 134.5 139.2 143.9 148.8 153.9 159.0 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 93.5 95.0 96.5 97.9 99.4 100.9 102.3 103.8 105.2 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 178.1 171.9 166.1 160.5 155.2 150.1 145.1 140.4 135.8 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 15.5 15.0 14.6 14.3 14.0 13.7 13.5 13.3 13.1 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1396 1439 1478 1514 1546 1575 1602 1625 1646 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1137 1075 1020 971 927 887 851 818 787 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 39 45 50 56 62 67 73 79 85 Fluorine ratio R = 0.628 0.603 0.580 0.558 0.537 0.518 0.499 0.482 0.466 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  90.7%  93.4%  96.0%  98.3% 100.4% 102.3% 104.0% 105.6% 106.9% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.5% 106.9% 107.3% 107.7% 108.1% 108.5% 108.9% 109.3% 109.7% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  91.8%  86.8%  82.3%  78.4%  74.8%  71.6%  68.7%  66.0%  63.5% drop

TABLE 4 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 6% R32 R32 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 89 84 79 74 69 64 59 54 49 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 6/5/89 6/10/84 6/15/79 6/20/74 6/25/69 6/30/64 6/35/59 6/40/54 6/45/49 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.80 5.76 5.73 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.1%  83.4%  83.6%  83.9%  84.1%  84.3%  84.5%  84.7%  84.8% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.6 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 52.9 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.8 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 14.75 15.04 15.30 15.52 15.71 15.87 16.01 16.12 16.21 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.54 2.61 2.67 2.72 2.77 2.80 2.83 2.86 2.87 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 122.8 127.1 131.5 136.0 140.7 145.4 150.3 155.4 160.5 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.05 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 94.4 95.9 97.4 98.8 100.3 101.7 103.2 104.6 106.1 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 175.8 169.9 164.2 158.8 153.6 148.5 143.7 139.0 134.6 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 15.1 14.7 14.3 14.0 13.7 13.5 13.3 13.1 12.9 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1429 1471 1510 1544 1576 1604 1630 1653 1673 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1101 1042 990 944 902 864 829 798 769 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 44 50 56 61 67 73 79 84 90 Fluorine ratio R = 0.626 0.601 0.578 0.556 0.536 0.516 0.498 0.481 0.465 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  92.8%  95.6%  98.0% 100.3% 102.4% 104.2% 105.9% 107.4% 108.7% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.6% 107.0% 107.4% 107.8% 108.2% 108.6% 108.9% 109.3% 109.7% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  88.8%  84.1%  79.9%  76.2%  72.8%  69.7%  66.9%  64.4%  62.1% drop

TABLE 5 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 7% R32 R32 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 88 83 78 73 68 63 58 53 48 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 7/5/88 7/10/83 7/15/78 7/20/73 7/25/68 7/30/63 7/35/58 7/40/53 7/45/48 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.80 5.76 5.73 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.1%  83.4%  83.7%  83.9%  84.2%  84.4%  84.5%  84.7%  84.9% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.7 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 52.7 52.8 53.0 53.1 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 15.06 15.35 15.59 15.80 15.99 16.14 16.27 16.37 16.45 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.60 2.66 2.72 2.77 2.82 2.85 2.88 2.90 2.92 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 124.3 128.6 133.0 137.5 142.1 146.9 151.8 156.8 162.0 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.05 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 95.3 96.8 98.2 99.7 101.1 102.6 104.0 105.4 106.9 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 173.7 167.9 162.4 157.1 152.0 147.1 142.3 137.7 133.3 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 14.8 14.4 14.0 13.7 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.7 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1463 1504 1541 1575 1606 1634 1659 1681 1701 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1066 1011 962 918 878 842 809 779 752 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 50 55 61 67 73 78 84 90 95 Fluorine ratio R = 0.624 0.599 0.576 0.554 0.534 0.515 0.497 0.480 0.464 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  95.0%  97.7% 100.1% 102.3% 104.3% 106.1% 107.7% 109.2% 110.5% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.7% 107.1% 107.5% 107.8% 108.2% 108.6% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  86.0%  81.6%  77.6%  74.1%  70.9%  68.0%  65.3%  62.9%  60.7% drop

TABLE 6 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 8% R32 R32 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 87 82 77 72 67 62 57 52 47 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 8/5/87 8/10/82 8/15/77 8/20/72 8/25/67 8/30/62 8/35/57 8/40/52 8/45/47 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.80 5.76 5.73 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.2%  83.5%  83.8%  84.0%  84.2%  84.4%  84.6%  84.8%  84.9% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.0 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.1 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 52.5 52.6 52.8 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.5 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 15.38 15.65 15.89 16.09 16.26 16.41 16.53 16.62 16.70 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.65 2.72 2.77 2.82 2.86 2.90 2.93 2.95 2.96 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 125.8 130.1 134.4 138.9 143.6 148.3 153.2 158.3 163.5 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 96.2 97.7 99.1 100.5 102.0 103.4 104.8 106.3 107.7 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 171.7 166.1 160.7 155.5 150.5 145.6 141.0 136.4 132.1 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 14.4 14.1 13.7 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.5 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1496 1536 1573 1606 1636 1663 1687 1709 1728 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1033 981 935 893 855 821 790 761 735 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 55 61 67 72 78 84 89 95 101 Fluorine ratio R = 0.622 0.597 0.574 0.553 0.533 0.514 0.496 0.479 0.462 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  97.1%  99.8% 102.1% 104.3% 106.3% 108.0% 109.6% 111.0% 112.2% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.8% 107.1% 107.5% 107.9% 108.2% 108.6% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  83.4%  79.2%  75.4%  72.1%  69.0%  66.3%  63.7%  61.4%  59.3% drop

TABLE 7 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 9% R32 R32 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 86 81 76 71 66 61 56 51 46 Comparative data Calculation results 134a R1234yf 9/5/86 9/10/81 9/15/76 9/20/71 9/25/66 9/30/61 9/35/56 9/40/51 9/45/46 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.80 5.76 5.73 5.70 5.68 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.3%  83.6%  83.8%  84.1%  84.3%  84.5%  84.7%  84.8%  85.0% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.1 4.7 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 52.3 52.5 52.6 52.8 52.9 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 15.69 15.95 16.18 16.37 16.54 16.67 16.78 16.87 16.94 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.71 2.77 2.83 2.87 2.91 2.95 2.97 2.99 3.00 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 127.3 131.5 135.9 140.4 145.0 149.8 154.7 159.8 165.0 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 97.1 98.6 100.0 101.4 102.8 104.2 105.6 107.1 108.5 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 169.7 164.3 159.0 153.9 149.0 144.2 139.6 135.2 130.9 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 14.1 13.8 13.5 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.3 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1529 1569 1604 1637 1666 1692 1716 1737 1755 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 1002 953 909 870 834 801 771 744 719 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 61 66 72 78 83 89 95 101 106 Fluorine ratio R = 0.620 0.595 0.573 0.551 0.531 0.512 0.494 0.477 0.461 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0%  99.3% 101.9% 104.2% 106.3% 108.2% 109.9% 111.4% 112.8% 114.0% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.9% 107.2% 107.6% 107.9% 108.3% 108.6% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  80.9%  76.9%  73.4%  70.2%  67.3%  64.7%  62.2%  60.0%  58.0% drop

TABLE 8 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 10% R32 R32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 Comparative data 10/ 10/ 10/15/ 10/20/ 10/25/ 10/30/ 10/35/ 10/40/ 10/45/ Calculation results 134a R1234yf 5/85 10/80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.80 5.76 5.72 5.69 5.67 5.66 5.65 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.3%  83.6%  83.9%  84.1%  84.4%  84.6%  84.7%  84.9%  85.0% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.4 5.0 4.7 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.4 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.6 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.2 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 52.1 52.3 52.5 52.7 52.8 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 16.00 16.25 16.47 16.66 16.81 16.94 17.04 17.12 17.18 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.76 2.82 2.88 2.92 2.96 2.99 3.02 3.04 3.05 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 128.7 132.9 137.3 141.8 146.4 151.2 156.1 161.2 166.4 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 98.0 99.4 100.8 102.2 103.6 105.0 106.4 107.9 109.3 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 167.9 162.5 157.4 152.4 147.6 142.9 138.4 134.0 129.8 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 13.8 13.5 13.2 13.0 12.7 12.5 12.4 12.2 12.1 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1562 1601 1636 1668 1696 1722 1744 1765 1782 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 972 926 885 847 813 782 753 727 703 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 66 72 78 83 89 95 100 106 112 Fluorine ratio R = 0.618 0.593 0.571 0.550 0.530 0.511 0.493 0.476 0.460 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0% 101.5% 104.0% 106.3% 108.3% 110.2% 111.8% 113.3% 114.6% 115.7% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.9% 107.3% 107.6% 107.9% 108.3% 108.7% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  78.5%  74.8%  71.4%  68.4%  65.6%  63.1%  60.8%  58.7%  56.7% drop

TABLE 9 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 11% R32 R32 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R1234ze(E) 84 79 74 69 64 59 54 49 44 Comparative data 11/5/ 11/10/ 11/15/ 11/20/ 11/25/ 11/30/ 11/35/ 11/40/ 11/45 Calculation results 134a R1234yf 84 79 74 69 64 59 54 49 44 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.79 5.75 5.72 5.69 5.67 5.65 5.64 5.64 5.63 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.4%  83.7%  84.0%  84.2%  84.4%  84.6%  84.8%  85.0%  85.1% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 4.6 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.7 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.7 −1.6 −1.6 −1.5 −1.4 −1.3 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 51.9 52.1 52.3 52.5 52.7 52.8 53.0 53.1 53.2 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 16.31 16.55 16.76 16.94 17.08 17.20 17.30 17.37 17.42 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.82 2.88 2.93 2.98 3.01 3.04 3.07 3.08 3.09 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 130.1 134.3 138.6 143.1 147.8 152.6 157.5 162.6 167.9 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.05 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 98.9 100.3 101.7 103.1 104.4 105.8 107.2 108.7 110.1 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 166.1 160.8 155.8 150.9 146.2 141.6 137.1 132.8 128.7 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 13.5 13.2 13.0 12.7 12.5 12.3 12.2 12.1 11.9 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1596 1633 1668 1698 1726 1751 1773 1792 1809 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 945 901 861 826 793 764 736 711 688 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 72 77 83 89 94 100 106 111 117 Fluorine ratio R = 0.616 0.592 0.569 0.548 0.528 0.509 0.492 0.475 0.459 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0% 103.6% 106.1% 108.3% 110.3% 112.1% 113.7% 115.1% 116.4% 117.5% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 107.0% 107.3% 107.6% 108.0% 108.3% 108.7% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  76.2%  72.7%  69.5%  66.7%  64.0%  61.6%  59.4%  57.4%  55.5% drop

TABLE 10 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E) Blends Containing 12% R32 R32 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 R152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 38 45 R1234ze(E) 83 78 73 68 63 58 53 50 43 Comparative data 12/5/ 12/10/ 12/15/ 12/20/ 12/25/ 12/30/ 12/35/ 12/38/ 12/45/ Calculation results 134a R1234yf 83 78 73 68 63 58 53 50 43 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.79 5.75 5.72 5.69 5.67 5.65 5.64 5.64 5.64 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.5%  83.8%  84.0%  84.3%  84.5%  84.7%  84.8%  84.9%  85.1% efficiency Condenser glide (K) 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.1 5.8 5.5 5.2 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.3 Evaporator glide 0.0 0.0 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 (K) Evaporator inlet T 0.0 0.0 −1.8 −1.8 −1.7 −1.6 −1.6 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 (° C.) Condenser exit T 55.0 55.0 51.8 51.9 52.1 52.3 52.4 52.5 52.7 52.7 52.8 (° C.) Condenser P (bar) 16.88 16.46 16.65 16.91 17.13 17.32 17.48 17.61 17.71 17.76 17.85 Evaporator P (bar) 2.92 3.14 2.88 2.94 3.00 3.04 3.08 3.11 3.14 3.15 3.17 Refrigeration 123.76 94.99 131.4 135.6 139.9 144.4 149.0 153.7 158.6 161.6 168.9 effect (kJ/kg) COP 2.03 1.91 2.05 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge T (° C.) 99.15 92.88 99.8 101.2 102.6 103.9 105.3 106.7 108.1 109.0 110.9 Mass flow rate 174.53 227.39 164.4 159.3 154.4 149.6 145.0 140.5 136.2 133.6 127.9 (kg/hr) Volumetric flow 13.16 14.03 13.2 12.9 12.7 12.4 12.2 12.1 11.9 11.8 11.7 rate (m3/hr) Volumetric capacity 1641 1540 1631 1670 1705 1737 1766 1791 1814 1827 1852 (m3/hr) Pressure drop 953 1239 917 875 837 802 771 742 716 701 669 (kPa/m) GWP (TAR basis) 77 83 88 94 100 105 111 115 123 Fluorine ratio R = 0.614 0.590 0.567 0.546 0.527 0.508 0.491 0.480 0.458 F/(F + H) Capacity relative 106.6% 100.0% 105.9% 108.5% 110.8% 112.8% 114.7% 116.3% 117.8% 118.6% 120.3% to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 107.0% 107.3% 107.6% 107.9% 108.2% 108.5% 108.9% 109.1% 109.6% Relative pressure  76.9% 100.0%  74.0%  70.6%  67.5%  64.8%  62.2%  59.9%  57.8%  56.6%  54.0% drop

TABLE 11 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 4% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 R-134a (% b/w) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze(E) 66 61 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 (% b/w) Calculation COMPARATIVE results R134a R1234yf Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.72 5.70 5.69 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.4%  83.6%  83.8%  84.0%  84.2%  84.4%  84.5%  84.7%  84.8% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.6 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 inlet T Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.6 53.7 53.8 53.9 53.9 54.0 54.0 54.1 54.1 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 15.52 15.70 15.85 15.98 16.09 16.17 16.24 16.30 16.34 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.71 2.75 2.78 2.81 2.83 2.85 2.86 2.87 2.87 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 121.58 126.41 131.35 136.41 141.57 146.85 152.23 157.71 163.29 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.10 Discharge T ° C. 99.15 92.88 95.12 96.71 98.30 99.87 101.44 103.00 104.55 106.09 107.63 Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 177.67 170.87 164.44 158.35 152.57 147.09 141.89 136.96 132.28 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 14.35 14.05 13.79 13.56 13.36 13.18 13.03 12.90 12.78 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1505 1537 1566 1593 1617 1638 1658 1675 1690 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 1054 1002 955 913 875 840 808 779 752 GWP (TAR basis) 357 363 368 374 380 385 391 397 403 F/(F + H) 0.631 0.607 0.584 0.562 0.542 0.523 0.504 0.487 0.471 Capacity 106.6% 100.0%  97.7%  99.8% 101.7% 103.4% 105.0% 106.4% 107.7% 108.8% 109.8% relative to 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.6% 107.1% 107.6% 108.1% 108.6% 109.1% 109.6% 110.1% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  85.0%  80.9%  77.1%  73.7%  70.6%  67.8%  65.2%  62.8%  60.7% pressure drop

TABLE 12 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 6% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 R-134a (% b/w) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze(E) 64 59 54 49 44 39 34 29 24 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ 6/25/ results 134a R1234yf 5/64 10/59 15/54 20/49 25/44 30/39 35/34 40/29 45/24 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.72 5.71 5.69 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.69 5.70 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.5%  83.8%  84.0%  84.2%  84.3%  84.5%  84.6%  84.8%  84.9% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.7 53.8 53.8 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.15 16.31 16.45 16.56 16.66 16.73 16.79 16.83 16.86 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.82 2.86 2.89 2.91 2.93 2.94 2.95 2.96 2.96 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 124.46 129.29 134.24 139.30 144.48 149.77 155.17 160.67 166.27 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.10 Discharge T ° C. 99.15 92.88 96.94 98.51 100.07 101.63 103.17 104.72 106.25 107.78 109.31 Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 173.55 167.07 160.91 155.06 149.51 144.22 139.20 134.44 129.91 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.75 13.49 13.25 13.05 12.87 12.72 12.58 12.47 12.36 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1571 1602 1630 1655 1678 1698 1716 1733 1747 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 992 945 903 865 830 798 769 742 718 GWP (TAR BASIS) 368 374 379 385 391 396 402 408 413 F/(F + H) 0.627 0.603 0.580 0.559 0.539 0.520 0.502 0.485 0.469 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 102.0% 104.0% 105.8% 107.5% 109.0% 110.3% 111.5% 112.5% 113.5% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.7% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.1% 109.6% 110.0% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  80.0%  76.3%  72.9%  69.8%  67.0%  64.4%  62.1%  59.9%  57.9% pressure drop

TABLE 13 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 8% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 R-134a (% b/w) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze(E) 62 57 52 47 42 37 32 27 22 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ 8/25/ results 134a R1234yf 5/62 10/57 15/52 20/47 25/42 30/37 35/32 40/27 45/22 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.72 5.70 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.7%  83.9%  84.1%  84.3%  84.5%  84.6%  84.7%  84.9%  85.0% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.9 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.4 53.5 53.5 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.77 16.92 17.04 17.14 17.22 17.28 17.32 17.35 17.37 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.93 2.97 2.99 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.05 3.05 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 127.25 132.08 137.03 142.11 147.30 152.61 158.03 163.56 169.18 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.10 Discharge T ° C. 99.15 92.88 98.72 100.26 101.80 103.34 104.87 106.40 107.92 109.44 110.95 Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 169.74 163.54 157.63 152.00 146.64 141.54 136.68 132.06 127.67 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.19 12.96 12.76 12.58 12.42 12.29 12.17 12.07 11.98 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1637 1667 1693 1717 1739 1758 1775 1790 1803 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 936 894 856 821 790 760 734 709 686 GWP (TAR BASIS) 379 384 390 396 402 407 413 419 424 F/(F + H) 0.623 0.599 0.577 0.556 0.536 0.517 0.499 0.483 0.467 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 106.3% 108.2% 110.0% 111.5% 112.9% 114.2% 115.3% 116.3% 117.1% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.2% 106.7% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.1% 109.6% 110.0% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  75.5%  72.2%  69.1%  66.3%  63.7%  61.4%  59.2%  57.2%  55.4% pressure drop

TABLE 14 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 10% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (% b/w) R-134a 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze(E) 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ 10/25/ results 134a R1234yf 5/60 10/55 15/50 20/45 25/40 30/35 35/30 40/25 45/20 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.71 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.67 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.69 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.8% 84.1% 84.3% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.6 52.7 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.2 53.2 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.39 17.52 17.63 17.71 17.78 17.83 17.86 17.87 17.88 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.05 3.08 3.10 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.14 3.14 3.14 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 129.95 134.79 139.75 144.84 150.05 155.38 160.83 166.38 172.04 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge T ° C. 99.15 92.88 100.45 101.97 103.49 105.01 106.53 108.05 109.56 111.07 112.57 Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 166.21 160.25 154.56 149.13 143.95 139.01 134.30 129.82 125.56 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.68 12.48 12.30 12.14 12.00 11.88 11.78 11.69 11.62 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1703 1731 1757 1779 1800 1818 1834 1847 1860 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 886 848 813 781 752 726 701 678 657 drop m GWP (TAR) 390 395 401 407 412 418 424 430 435 F/(F + H) 0.619 0.595 0.573 0.552 0.533 0.514 0.497 0.480 0.465 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 110.6% 112.4% 114.1% 115.6% 116.9% 118.1% 119.1% 120.0% 120.8% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.3% 106.8% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.6% 109.1% 109.5% 110.0% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 71.5% 68.4% 65.6% 63.1% 60.7% 58.6% 56.6% 54.7% 53.0% pressure drop

TABLE 14A Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 12% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 (% b/w) R-134a 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze(E) 58 53 48 43 38 33 28 23 18 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ 12/25/ results 134a R1234yf 5/58 10/53 15/48 20/43 25/38 30/33 35/28 40/23 45/18 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.70 5.68 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.69 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.0% 84.2% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.0 4.7 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.0 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.6 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.8 52.9 52.9 53.0 53.0 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.00 18.12 18.21 18.28 18.33 18.36 18.38 18.39 18.38 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.16 3.19 3.21 3.23 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.23 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 132.58 137.42 142.40 147.51 152.74 158.10 163.57 169.15 174.83 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 102.14 103.64 105.15 106.65 108.16 109.66 111.16 112.66 114.15 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 162.92 157.18 151.69 146.44 141.42 136.63 132.05 127.70 123.55 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.21 12.03 11.87 11.73 11.61 11.51 11.42 11.34 11.28 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1769 1796 1820 1841 1860 1877 1892 1905 1916 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 840 805 774 745 718 694 671 650 630 drop m GWP (TAR 400 406 412 418 423 429 435 440 446 BASIS) F/(F + H) 0.615 0.592 0.570 0.549 0.530 0.512 0.494 0.478 0.462 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 114.9% 116.6% 118.2% 119.6% 120.8% 121.9% 122.9% 123.7% 124.4% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.3% 106.8% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.6% 109.0% 109.5% 109.9% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 67.8% 65.0% 62.5% 60.1% 58.0% 56.0% 54.1% 52.4% 50.9% pressure drop

TABLE 15 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 15% R32 and 25% R134a R-32 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 (% b/w) R-134a 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze(E) 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ 15/25/ results 134a R1234yf 5/55 10/50 15/45 20/40 25/35 30/30 35/25 40/20 45/15 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.67 5.66 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.66 5.67 5.68 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.3% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% 85.4% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 5.8 5.5 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.5 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.8 −1.8 −1.7 −1.6 −1.6 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.1 52.3 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.6 52.7 52.7 52.7 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.90 19.00 19.07 19.12 19.15 19.16 19.16 19.15 19.12 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.33 3.36 3.37 3.38 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.38 3.37 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 136.38 141.24 146.25 151.39 156.66 162.06 167.58 173.20 178.93 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 104.61 106.09 107.58 109.06 110.55 112.04 113.53 115.01 116.49 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 158.38 152.93 147.69 142.68 137.88 133.28 128.90 124.71 120.72 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.57 11.42 11.29 11.17 11.07 10.99 10.92 10.86 10.80 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1867 1892 1914 1934 1951 1966 1979 1990 1999 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 779 749 721 696 672 650 630 611 593 drop m GWP (TAR 417 423 428 434 440 445 451 457 462 BASIS) F/(F + H) 0.609 0.586 0.565 0.545 0.526 0.508 0.491 0.475 0.459 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 121.2% 122.9% 124.3% 125.6% 126.7% 127.7% 128.5% 129.2% 129.8% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.3% 106.8% 107.2% 107.6% 108.1% 108.5% 108.9% 109.4% 109.8% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 62.9% 60.4% 58.2% 56.1% 54.2% 52.5% 50.8% 49.3% 47.9% pressure drop

TABLE 16 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 4% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (% b/w) R-134a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze(E) 61 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ 4/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/61 10/56 15/51 20/46 25/41 30/36 35/31 40/26 45/21 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.71 5.70 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.70 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.5% 83.7% 83.9% 84.1% 84.3% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.7 −0.7 −0.6 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.7 53.8 53.8 53.9 54.0 54.0 54.1 54.1 54.1 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 15.78 15.94 16.07 16.18 16.27 16.34 16.40 16.44 16.46 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.76 2.80 2.83 2.85 2.86 2.88 2.88 2.89 2.89 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 121.98 126.90 131.92 137.07 142.33 147.69 153.16 158.73 164.40 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge T ° C. 99.15 92.88 95.65 97.25 98.85 100.43 102.01 103.59 105.15 106.71 108.26 Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 177.07 170.22 163.73 157.59 151.76 146.25 141.02 136.08 131.39 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 14.11 13.83 13.59 13.38 13.20 13.04 12.90 12.78 12.67 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1531 1562 1589 1614 1637 1657 1675 1691 1705 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 1033 983 938 898 861 827 796 768 742 drop m Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 99.4% 101.4% 103.2% 104.8% 106.3% 107.6% 108.8% 109.8% 110.7% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.1% 107.6% 108.1% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.1% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 83.4% 79.3% 75.7% 72.5% 69.5% 66.7% 64.3% 62.0% 59.9% pressure drop

TABLE 17 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 6% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 (% b/w) R-134a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze(E) 59 54 49 44 39 34 29 24 19 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ 6/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/59 10/54 15/49 20/44 25/39 30/34 35/29 40/24 45/19 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.71 5.70 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.69 5.70 5.71 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.6% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% 84.4% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.7 53.8 53.8 53.8 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.41 16.55 16.67 16.76 16.84 16.90 16.94 16.96 16.98 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.87 2.90 2.93 2.95 2.96 2.97 2.98 2.98 2.97 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 124.84 129.76 134.80 139.95 145.23 150.61 156.11 161.70 167.39 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 97.46 99.04 100.62 102.19 103.75 105.31 106.86 108.40 109.94 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 173.02 166.46 160.24 154.34 148.73 143.41 138.37 133.58 129.04 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.52 13.28 13.07 12.89 12.72 12.58 12.46 12.36 12.27 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1597 1626 1653 1676 1697 1716 1733 1748 1761 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 973 928 888 851 817 787 758 732 708 drop m Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 103.7% 105.6% 107.3% 108.9% 110.2% 111.5% 112.6% 113.5% 114.4% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.6% 107.1% 107.6% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.6% 110.1% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 78.5% 74.9% 71.7% 68.7% 66.0% 63.5% 61.2% 59.1% 57.2% pressure drop

TABLE 18 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 8% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 R-134a (% b/w) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze (E) 57 52 47 42 37 32 27 22 17 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ 8/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/57 10/52 15/47 20/42 25/37 30/32 35/27 40/22 45/17 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.71 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.8%  84.0%  84.2%  84.3%  84.5%  84.7%  84.8%  84.9%  85.0% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.2 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.4 53.5 53.5 53.5 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.03 17.15 17.26 17.34 17.40 17.44 17.47 17.48 17.49 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.98 3.01 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.07 3.07 3.06 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 127.62 132.54 137.59 142.76 148.05 153.46 158.98 164.60 170.32 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 99.23 100.79 102.34 103.90 105.45 106.99 108.53 110.06 111.59 temperature Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 169.26 162.97 156.99 151.30 145.89 140.75 135.87 131.23 126.82 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.99 12.78 12.59 12.43 12.29 12.16 12.06 11.97 11.89 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1663 1691 1716 1738 1758 1776 1792 1805 1817 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 919 879 842 809 778 750 724 700 678 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 108.0% 109.8% 111.4% 112.9% 114.2% 115.3% 116.4% 117.2% 118.0% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.6% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.1% 109.6% 110.1% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  74.2%  70.9%  68.0%  65.3%  62.8%  60.5%  58.4%  56.5%  54.7% pressure drop

TABLE 19 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 10% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (% b/w) R-134a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ 10/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/55 10/50 15/45 20/40 25/35 30/30 35/25 40/20 45/15 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.70 5.68 5.68 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.9% 84.1% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.7 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.2 53.3 53.3 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.64 17.75 17.84 17.91 17.95 17.98 18.00 18.00 17.99 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.10 3.12 3.14 3.16 3.16 3.17 3.17 3.16 3.15 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 130.30 135.24 140.30 145.49 150.81 156.24 161.79 167.44 173.18 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 100.95 102.49 104.03 105.57 107.11 108.64 110.17 111.69 113.21 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 165.77 159.72 153.95 148.46 143.23 138.24 133.51 129.00 124.72 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.50 12.31 12.14 12.00 11.88 11.77 11.68 11.60 11.53 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1729 1755 1779 1800 1819 1835 1850 1862 1873 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 871 834 800 770 742 716 692 670 649 drop m GWP (TAR) 454 460 466 471 477 483 489 494 500 F/(F + H) 0.619 0.596 0.574 0.553 0.533 0.515 0.498 0.481 0.465 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 112.3% 114.0% 115.5% 116.9% 118.1% 119.2% 120.1% 120.9% 121.6% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.2% 106.7% 107.2% 107.7% 108.2% 108.6% 109.1% 109.6% 110.0% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 70.3% 67.3% 64.6% 62.1% 59.9% 57.8% 55.8% 54.0% 52.4% pressure drop

TABLE 20 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 12% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 R-134a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 53 48 43 38 33 28 23 18 13 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ 12/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/53 10/48 15/43 20/38 25/33 30/28 35/23 40/18 45/13 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.68 5.67 5.67 5.66 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.69 5.70 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.1% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% 85.2% 85.3% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.7 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.9 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.8 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.1 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.25 18.34 18.42 18.47 18.50 18.52 18.52 18.51 18.49 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.21 3.23 3.25 3.26 3.27 3.27 3.26 3.25 3.24 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 132.92 137.87 142.95 148.17 153.51 158.97 164.54 170.22 176.00 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 102.64 104.17 105.69 107.22 108.74 110.26 111.78 113.30 114.80 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 162.50 156.67 151.10 145.78 140.71 135.87 131.27 126.89 122.73 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.04 11.87 11.73 11.60 11.49 11.40 11.32 11.26 11.20 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1794 1819 1842 1862 1879 1894 1908 1919 1929 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 826 793 762 734 708 684 662 642 623 drop m GWP (TAR) 465 471 477 482 488 494 499 505 511 F/(F + H) 0.615 0.592 0.570 0.550 0.531 0.512 0.495 0.479 0.463 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 116.5% 118.2% 119.6% 120.9% 122.0% 123.0% 123.9% 124.6% 125.3% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.2% 106.7% 107.2% 107.7% 108.1% 108.6% 109.1% 109.5% 109.9% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 66.7% 64.0% 61.5% 59.3% 57.2% 55.2% 53.5% 51.8% 50.3% pressure drop

TABLE 20A Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 15% R32 and 30% R134a R-32 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 (% b/w) R-134a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-152a 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 (% b/w) R-1234ze 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ 15/30/ results 134a R1234yf 5/50 10/45 15/40 20/35 25/30 30/25 35/20 40/15 45/10 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.66 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.66 5.67 5.69 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.3% 85.4% 85.5% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 5.5 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.8 −1.7 −1.6 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 inlet temperature Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.3 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.7 52.7 52.8 52.8 exit temperature Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 19.15 19.22 19.27 19.30 19.31 19.31 19.29 19.27 19.23 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.38 3.40 3.41 3.42 3.42 3.42 3.41 3.40 3.38 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 136.71 141.69 146.81 152.06 157.45 162.96 168.58 174.31 180.13 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 105.12 106.62 108.12 109.63 111.14 112.65 114.15 115.65 117.15 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 157.99 152.44 147.13 142.05 137.19 132.55 128.13 123.92 119.91 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.42 11.28 11.16 11.06 10.97 10.89 10.83 10.78 10.74 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1892 1915 1935 1953 1969 1983 1994 2004 2012 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 767 738 711 686 663 642 622 604 587 drop m GWP (TAR 482 487 493 499 504 510 516 521 527 BASIS) F/(F + H) 0.609 0.587 0.565 0.545 0.526 0.508 0.492 0.475 0.460 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 122.9% 124.4% 125.7% 126.9% 127.9% 128.8% 129.5% 130.1% 130.7% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.2% 106.7% 107.1% 107.6% 108.1% 108.5% 109.0% 109.4% 109.8% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 61.9% 59.6% 57.4% 55.4% 53.5% 51.8% 50.2% 48.7% 47.4% pressure drop

TABLE 21 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 4% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 16 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ 4/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/56 10/51 15/46 20/41 25/36 30/31 35/26 40/21 45/16 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.70 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.70 5.72 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.6% 83.8% 84.0% 84.1% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.7 −0.6 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.7 53.8 53.9 54.0 54.0 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.2 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.03 16.17 16.28 16.37 16.44 16.50 16.54 16.56 16.57 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.81 2.84 2.86 2.88 2.89 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 122.44 127.44 132.56 137.80 143.15 148.61 154.18 159.83 165.58 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 96.18 97.80 99.41 101.01 102.61 104.19 105.77 107.34 108.90 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 176.41 169.49 162.94 156.75 150.89 145.34 140.10 135.14 130.45 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.88 13.63 13.41 13.21 13.05 12.90 12.78 12.67 12.57 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1557 1585 1611 1635 1656 1674 1691 1705 1718 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 1013 965 922 883 847 815 785 757 732 drop m GWP (TAR) 486 492 498 503 509 515 521 526 532 F/(F + H) 0.632 0.607 0.584 0.563 0.543 0.524 0.506 0.489 0.473 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 101.1% 103.0% 104.6% 106.2% 107.5% 108.7% 109.8% 110.8% 111.6% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.4% 107.0% 107.6% 108.1% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.2% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 81.8% 77.9% 74.4% 71.3% 68.4% 65.7% 63.3% 61.1% 59.1% pressure drop

TABLE 22 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 6% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 54 49 44 39 34 29 24 19 14 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ 6/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/54 10/49 15/44 20/39 25/34 30/29 35/24 40/19 45/14 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.70 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.7% 83.9% 84.1% 84.3% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.4 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.7 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.65 16.78 16.87 16.95 17.01 17.05 17.07 17.09 17.09 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.92 2.95 2.97 2.98 2.99 3.00 3.00 2.99 2.99 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 125.29 130.29 135.43 140.68 146.06 151.54 157.13 162.81 168.59 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 97.99 99.59 101.18 102.76 104.34 105.92 107.48 109.04 110.59 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 172.41 165.78 159.49 153.54 147.89 142.54 137.47 132.67 128.12 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.31 13.09 12.90 12.73 12.59 12.46 12.35 12.26 12.18 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1622 1650 1674 1696 1716 1734 1749 1762 1774 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 955 912 873 838 805 775 748 723 699 drop m GWP (TAR) 497 503 509 514 520 526 531 537 543 F/(F + H) 0.627 0.603 0.581 0.560 0.540 0.521 0.503 0.487 0.471 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 105.4% 107.1% 108.7% 110.2% 111.5% 112.6% 113.6% 114.5% 115.2% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.5% 107.1% 107.6% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.2% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 77.1% 73.6% 70.5% 67.6% 65.0% 62.6% 60.4% 58.3% 56.4% pressure drop

TABLE 23 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 8% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 52 47 42 37 32 27 22 17 12 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ 8/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/52 10/47 15/42 20/37 25/32 30/27 35/22 40/17 45/12 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% 84.4% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.4 53.5 53.5 53.5 53.6 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.27 17.38 17.46 17.52 17.57 17.59 17.61 17.60 17.59 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.03 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.09 3.09 3.08 3.08 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 128.04 133.07 138.22 143.49 148.89 154.40 160.01 165.73 171.53 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 99.75 101.33 102.90 104.47 106.04 107.60 109.16 110.71 112.25 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 168.69 162.33 156.28 150.53 145.07 139.90 134.99 130.33 125.92 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.80 12.60 12.43 12.29 12.16 12.05 11.95 11.87 11.80 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1688 1714 1737 1758 1777 1793 1807 1819 1830 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 903 864 829 796 767 739 714 691 669 drop m GWP (TAR 508 514 520 525 531 537 542 548 554 BASIS) F/(F + H) 0.623 0.600 0.578 0.557 0.537 0.518 0.501 0.484 0.468 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 109.6% 111.3% 112.8% 114.2% 115.4% 116.4% 117.4% 118.2% 118.8% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.6% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.1% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 72.9% 69.8% 66.9% 64.3% 61.9% 59.7% 57.6% 55.8% 54.0% pressure drop

TABLE 24 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 10% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ 10/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/50 10/45 15/40 20/35 25/30 30/25 35/20 40/15 45/10 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.68 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.72 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.0% 84.2% 84.4% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.3 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.8 53.0 53.1 53.1 53.2 53.2 53.3 53.3 53.3 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.88 17.97 18.04 18.09 18.12 18.13 18.13 18.12 18.09 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.14 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.18 3.18 3.17 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 130.73 135.76 140.93 146.24 151.66 157.20 162.84 168.58 174.42 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 101.48 103.04 104.59 106.15 107.71 109.26 110.80 112.34 113.87 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 165.23 159.10 153.26 147.71 142.43 137.41 132.65 128.13 123.84 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.32 12.15 12.00 11.87 11.76 11.66 11.58 11.51 11.46 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1753 1778 1800 1820 1837 1852 1865 1876 1885 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 856 821 788 759 731 706 683 661 641 drop m GWP (TAR) 519 525 530 536 542 548 553 559 565 F/(F + H) 0.619 0.596 0.574 0.554 0.534 0.516 0.498 0.482 0.466 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 113.9% 115.5% 116.9% 118.2% 119.3% 120.3% 121.1% 121.8% 122.5% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.6% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.1% 109.6% 110.1% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 69.1% 66.2% 63.6% 61.2% 59.0% 57.0% 55.1% 53.4% 51.8% pressure drop

TABLE 25 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 12% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 48 43 38 33 28 23 18 13 8 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ 12/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/48 10/43 15/38 20/33 25/28 30/23 35/18 40/13 45/8 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.67 5.67 5.66 5.66 5.67 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.2% 84.4% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.5 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.4 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.6 52.8 52.9 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.1 53.1 53.1 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.48 18.56 18.61 18.65 18.66 18.66 18.65 18.62 18.59 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.26 3.28 3.29 3.29 3.29 3.29 3.28 3.27 3.25 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 133.34 138.39 143.59 148.92 154.37 159.94 165.61 171.39 177.25 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 103.16 104.71 106.25 107.80 109.34 110.88 112.42 113.95 115.47 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 162.00 156.08 150.43 145.05 139.93 135.05 130.43 126.03 121.86 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.88 11.73 11.60 11.48 11.39 11.31 11.24 11.18 11.13 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1818 1842 1863 1881 1897 1911 1922 1932 1941 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 814 781 751 724 699 675 654 634 616 drop m GWP (TAR) 530 536 541 547 553 558 564 570 575 F/(F + H) 0.615 0.592 0.571 0.550 0.531 0.513 0.496 0.480 0.464 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 118.1% 119.6% 121.0% 122.2% 123.2% 124.1% 124.9% 125.5% 126.0% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.6% 107.1% 107.6% 108.1% 108.6% 109.1% 109.6% 110.0% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 65.7% 63.0% 60.6% 58.4% 56.4% 54.5% 52.8% 51.2% 49.7% pressure drop

TABLE 26 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 15% R32 and 35% R134a R-32 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 (% b/w) R-134a 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ 15/35/ results 134a R1234yf 5/45 10/40 15/35 20/30 25/25 30/20 35/15 40/10 45/5 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.65 5.65 5.64 5.65 5.65 5.66 5.67 5.69 5.70 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.4% 84.6% 84.8% 84.9% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% 85.4% 85.5% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.7 −1.6 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.5 −1.4 −1.5 −1.5 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.4 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.7 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 19.38 19.43 19.46 19.47 19.47 19.45 19.42 19.37 19.32 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.43 3.44 3.45 3.45 3.44 3.44 3.42 3.41 3.39 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 137.13 142.23 147.46 152.83 158.33 163.95 169.68 175.50 181.42 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.08 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 105.64 107.17 108.69 110.22 111.75 113.28 114.80 116.32 117.83 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 157.51 151.87 146.48 141.33 136.42 131.75 127.30 123.07 119.06 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.28 11.15 11.04 10.95 10.87 10.81 10.75 10.71 10.68 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1916 1937 1956 1972 1986 1998 2008 2017 2023 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 756 728 701 677 655 634 615 597 580 drop m GWP (TAR 546 552 558 563 569 575 580 586 592 BASIS) F/(F + H) 0.610 0.587 0.566 0.546 0.527 0.509 0.492 0.476 0.461 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 124.4% 125.8% 127.0% 128.1% 129.0% 129.8% 130.4% 131.0% 131.4% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.1% 106.6% 107.1% 107.6% 108.0% 108.5% 109.0% 109.5% 109.9% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 61.0% 58.7% 56.6% 54.6% 52.8% 51.2% 49.6% 48.2% 46.8% pressure drop

TABLE 27 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 4% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (% b/w) R-134a 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 16 11 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ 4/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/51 10/46 15/41 20/36 25/31 30/26 35/21 40/16 45/11 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.70 5.72 5.73 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.6% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.6 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.4 −0.4 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.8 53.9 54.0 54.0 54.1 54.1 54.2 54.2 54.2 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.27 16.38 16.48 16.55 16.61 16.64 16.67 16.68 16.68 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.86 2.88 2.90 2.91 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.91 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 122.96 128.06 133.27 138.61 144.06 149.61 155.27 161.01 166.84 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.02 2.03 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 96.73 98.36 99.99 101.60 103.22 104.82 106.41 108.00 109.57 temperature Mass flow kg/hr 174.53 227.39 175.67 168.68 162.07 155.83 149.94 144.37 139.11 134.15 129.46 rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.66 13.43 13.23 13.06 12.91 12.78 12.66 12.57 12.48 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1581 1608 1632 1654 1673 1691 1706 1719 1730 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 994 948 907 869 834 803 774 747 723 drop m GWP (TAR) 551 557 562 568 574 580 585 591 597 F/(F + H) 0.632 0.608 0.585 0.564 0.543 0.525 0.507 0.490 0.474 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 102.7% 104.4% 106.0% 107.4% 108.7% 109.8% 110.8% 111.6% 112.4% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.8% 106.4% 107.0% 107.6% 108.2% 108.7% 109.3% 109.8% 110.3% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 80.3% 76.5% 73.2% 70.1% 67.3% 64.8% 62.4% 60.3% 58.3% pressure drop

TABLE 28 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 6% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 R-134a (% b/w) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze(E) 49 44 39 34 29 24 19 14 9 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ 6/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/49 10/44 15/39 20/34 25/29 30/24 35/19 40/14 45/9 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.69 5.68 5.69 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.73 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.8%  84.0%  84.1%  84.3%  84.5%  84.6%  84.7%  84.8%  84.9% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.8 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.5 53.6 53.7 53.7 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.9 53.9 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.89 16.99 17.07 17.13 17.17 17.19 17.20 17.20 17.19 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.97 2.99 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.02 3.01 3.01 3.00 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 125.79 130.90 136.14 141.50 146.97 152.55 158.23 164.01 169.87 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 98.54 100.15 101.75 103.36 104.95 106.54 108.13 109.70 111.26 temperature Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 171.71 165.01 158.66 152.65 146.97 141.59 136.51 131.70 127.16 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.12 12.92 12.74 12.59 12.46 12.35 12.25 12.16 12.09 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1646 1672 1695 1716 1734 1750 1764 1776 1786 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 939 897 859 825 793 764 738 713 691 GWP (TAR) 562 568 573 579 585 590 596 602 608 F/(F + H) 0.628 0.604 0.581 0.560 0.540 0.522 0.504 0.487 0.471 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 106.9% 108.6% 110.1% 111.4% 112.6% 113.6% 114.5% 115.3% 116.0% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.1% 107.6% 108.2% 108.7% 109.3% 109.8% 110.3% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  75.8%  72.4%  69.3%  66.6%  64.0%  61.7%  59.5%  57.6%  55.7% pressure drop

TABLE 29 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 8% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 R-134a (% b/w) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 R-1234ze(E) 47 42 37 32 27 22 17 12 7 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ 8/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/47 10/42 15/37 20/32 25/27 30/22 35/17 40/12 45/7 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.73 Volumetric  83.6%  84.7%  83.9%  84.1%  84.3%  84.4%  84.6%  84.7%  84.8%  84.9%  85.0% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.8 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.4 53.5 53.5 53.6 53.6 53.6 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.50 17.59 17.65 17.69 17.72 17.73 17.73 17.71 17.69 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.08 3.10 3.11 3.11 3.12 3.11 3.11 3.10 3.09 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 128.55 133.67 138.93 144.31 149.81 155.42 161.14 166.94 172.83 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 100.30 101.89 103.48 105.07 106.65 108.23 109.81 111.37 112.92 temperature Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 168.03 161.59 155.47 149.67 144.18 138.97 134.05 129.39 124.98 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.62 12.44 12.29 12.16 12.04 11.94 11.86 11.79 11.73 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1712 1736 1758 1777 1794 1809 1821 1832 1841 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 888 850 816 785 756 729 705 682 661 GWP (TAR BASIS) 573 579 584 590 596 601 607 613 618 F/(F + H) 0.624 0.600 0.578 0.557 0.538 0.519 0.502 0.485 0.469 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 111.2% 112.8% 114.2% 115.4% 116.5% 117.5% 118.3% 119.0% 119.6% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.5% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.2% Relative  76.9% 100.0%  71.7%  68.6%  65.9%  63.3%  61.0%  58.8%  56.9%  55.1%  53.4% pressure drop

TABLE 30 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 10% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (% b/w) R-134a 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ 10/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/45 10/40 15/35 20/30 25/25 30/20 35/15 40/10 45/5 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.68 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.72 5.73 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.1% 84.3% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.2 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.0 53.1 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.3 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.11 18.18 18.23 18.26 18.27 18.27 18.25 18.22 18.19 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.21 3.21 3.20 3.19 3.17 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 131.23 136.37 141.66 147.07 152.60 158.24 163.98 169.82 175.74 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 102.02 103.60 105.17 106.75 108.32 109.89 111.46 113.01 114.55 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 164.60 158.39 152.48 146.87 141.55 136.50 131.72 127.20 122.91 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.16 12.00 11.87 11.75 11.65 11.57 11.50 11.44 11.39 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1777 1800 1820 1838 1854 1867 1879 1889 1897 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 843 808 777 748 721 697 674 653 634 drop GWP (TAR) m 584 589 595 601 607 612 618 624 629 F/(F + H) 0.620 0.596 0.575 0.554 0.535 0.516 0.499 0.483 0.467 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 115.4% 116.9% 118.2% 119.4% 120.4% 121.3% 122.0% 122.7% 123.2% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.6% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.2% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 68.0% 65.2% 62.7% 60.3% 58.2% 56.2% 54.4% 52.7% 51.2% pressure drop

TABLE 31 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 12% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 (% b/w) R-134a 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 43 38 33 28 23 18 13 8 3 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ 12/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/43 10/38 15/33 20/28 25/23 30/18 35/13 40/8 45/3 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.67 5.66 5.66 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.70 5.71 5.72 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.2% 84.4% 84.6% 84.7% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.4 −1.3 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.8 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.1 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.71 18.76 18.80 18.81 18.81 18.79 18.76 18.73 18.68 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.30 3.31 3.32 3.32 3.31 3.31 3.29 3.28 3.26 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 133.84 139.01 144.32 149.76 155.32 161.00 166.77 172.64 178.60 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 103.71 105.27 106.84 108.40 109.97 111.53 113.08 114.62 116.16 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 161.39 155.38 149.66 144.23 139.06 134.16 129.52 125.11 120.94 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.73 11.59 11.47 11.37 11.29 11.22 11.16 11.11 11.07 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1842 1863 1882 1899 1913 1926 1936 1945 1952 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 801 769 741 714 689 667 646 627 609 drop m GWP (TAR) 595 600 606 612 617 623 629 634 640 F/(F + H) 0.616 0.593 0.571 0.551 0.532 0.514 0.497 0.480 0.465 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 119.6% 121.0% 122.3% 123.3% 124.3% 125.1% 125.7% 126.3% 126.8% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.6% 107.1% 107.6% 108.1% 108.7% 109.1% 109.6% 110.1% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 64.6% 62.1% 59.8% 57.6% 55.6% 53.8% 52.1% 50.6% 49.1% pressure drop

TABLE 32 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 15% R32 and 40% R134a R-32 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 (% b/w) R-134a 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ 15/40/ results 134a R1234yf 5/40 10/35 15/30 20/25 25/20 30/15 35/10 40/5 45/0 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.64 5.64 5.65 5.65 5.66 5.67 5.68 5.70 5.71 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.5% 84.7% 84.8% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% 85.4% 85.5% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.6 −1.5 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 −1.5 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.5 52.6 52.7 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 19.60 19.63 19.64 19.63 19.61 19.57 19.53 19.47 19.40 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.47 3.48 3.48 3.47 3.46 3.45 3.44 3.42 3.40 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 137.65 142.86 148.22 153.71 159.32 165.04 170.87 176.79 182.80 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.10 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 106.19 107.73 109.28 110.84 112.39 113.93 115.47 117.01 118.53 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 156.92 151.20 145.73 140.53 135.58 130.87 126.41 122.18 118.16 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.14 11.03 10.94 10.85 10.79 10.73 10.69 10.65 10.62 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1938 1958 1975 1990 2002 2013 2022 2028 2034 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 745 717 692 668 646 626 608 590 574 drop GWP (TAR) m 611 617 622 628 634 639 645 651 657 F/(F + H) 0.610 0.588 0.566 0.546 0.528 0.510 0.493 0.477 0.462 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 125.9% 127.2% 128.3% 129.2% 130.1% 130.7% 131.3% 131.7% 132.1% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.5% 107.0% 107.6% 108.1% 108.6% 109.0% 109.5% 110.0% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 60.1% 57.9% 55.8% 53.9% 52.2% 50.5% 49.0% 47.6% 46.3% pressure drop

TABLE 33 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 4% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (% b/w) R-134a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 46 41 36 31 26 21 16 11 6 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ 4/45/ results 134a R1234yf 5/46 10/41 15/36 20/31 25/26 30/21 35/16 40/11 45/6 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.73 5.74 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.7% 83.9% 84.1% 84.2% 84.4% 84.5% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.6 −0.6 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −0.4 −0.4 −0.4 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.9 54.0 54.0 54.1 54.1 54.2 54.2 54.2 54.2 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 16.49 16.59 16.66 16.72 16.76 16.78 16.79 16.78 16.77 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 2.90 2.92 2.93 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.93 2.92 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 123.55 128.75 134.06 139.50 145.05 150.70 156.44 162.27 168.18 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.02 2.03 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 97.30 98.94 100.58 102.22 103.84 105.46 107.07 108.66 110.25 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 174.83 167.77 161.12 154.84 148.92 143.33 138.07 133.11 128.43 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 13.47 13.26 13.07 12.92 12.78 12.66 12.56 12.48 12.40 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1604 1629 1652 1672 1690 1706 1720 1731 1742 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 976 932 892 855 822 791 763 737 714 drop m GWP (TAR) 616 621 627 633 639 644 650 656 661 F/(F + H) 0.632 0.608 0.585 0.564 0.544 0.525 0.507 0.490 0.474 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 104.2% 105.8% 107.3% 108.6% 109.8% 110.8% 111.7% 112.5% 113.1% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.8% 106.4% 107.0% 107.6% 108.2% 108.8% 109.4% 109.9% 110.4% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 78.8% 75.2% 72.0% 69.0% 66.3% 63.9% 61.6% 59.5% 57.6% pressure drop

TABLE 34 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 6% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 (% b/w) R-134a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 44 39 34 29 24 19 14 9 4 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ 6/45/ results 134a R1234yf 5/44 10/39 15/34 20/29 25/24 30/19 35/14 40/9 45/4 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.69 5.68 5.69 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.73 5.75 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −0.8 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.7 −0.6 −0.6 −0.6 −0.7 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.6 53.7 53.7 53.8 53.8 53.8 53.9 53.9 53.9 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.11 17.19 17.25 17.29 17.31 17.32 17.32 17.30 17.27 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.04 3.03 3.03 3.02 3.01 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 126.38 131.59 136.94 142.40 147.97 153.65 159.42 165.28 171.22 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 99.10 100.73 102.35 103.97 105.58 107.19 108.79 110.37 111.94 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 170.92 164.14 157.74 151.69 145.97 140.58 135.49 130.68 126.15 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.94 12.76 12.60 12.46 12.34 12.24 12.15 12.08 12.02 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1669 1693 1715 1734 1750 1765 1777 1788 1797 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 923 882 846 812 782 754 728 704 682 drop m GWP (TAR) 627 632 638 644 649 655 661 667 672 F/(F + H) 0.628 0.604 0.582 0.561 0.541 0.522 0.505 0.488 0.472 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 108.4% 110.0% 111.4% 112.6% 113.7% 114.6% 115.4% 116.1% 116.7% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.8% 109.3% 109.9% 110.4% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 74.5% 71.2% 68.3% 65.6% 63.1% 60.8% 58.8% 56.8% 55.1% pressure drop Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 8% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 (% b/w) R-134a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 42 37 32 27 22 17 12 7 2 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ 8/45/ results 134a R1234yf 5/42 10/37 15/32 20/27 25/22 30/17 35/12 40/7 45/2 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.73 5.75 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.0% 84.2% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.7% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.0 −0.9 −0.9 −0.9 −0.8 −0.8 −0.8 −0.8 −0.8 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.5 53.5 53.6 53.6 53.6 53.6 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 17.72 17.78 17.83 17.85 17.86 17.86 17.84 17.81 17.77 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.14 3.14 3.13 3.12 3.11 3.09 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 129.13 134.37 139.74 145.23 150.83 156.54 162.35 168.24 174.21 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 100.86 102.47 104.08 105.69 107.29 108.89 110.47 112.05 113.61 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 167.27 160.75 154.58 148.73 143.21 137.98 133.05 128.39 123.99 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.45 12.29 12.16 12.04 11.93 11.85 11.77 11.71 11.66 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1734 1757 1777 1795 1810 1823 1834 1844 1852 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 874 837 804 773 745 719 696 674 654 drop m GWP (TAR) 638 643 649 655 660 666 672 677 683 F/(F + H) 0.624 0.600 0.578 0.558 0.538 0.520 0.502 0.486 0.470 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 112.6% 114.1% 115.4% 116.6% 117.5% 118.4% 119.1% 119.8% 120.3% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.8% 109.3% 109.8% 110.3% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 70.5% 67.6% 64.9% 62.4% 60.1% 58.1% 56.2% 54.4% 52.7% pressure drop

TABLE 35 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 10% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (% b/w) R-134a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 10/45/ 134a R1234yf 5/40 10/35 15/30 20/25 25/20 30/15 35/10 40/5 45/0 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.68 5.69 5.70 5.72 5.73 5.75 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.1% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.1 −1.1 −1.1 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 53.1 53.2 53.2 53.3 53.3 53.3 53.4 53.4 53.4 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.32 18.37 18.40 18.41 18.41 18.39 18.36 18.32 18.27 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.23 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.23 3.22 3.21 3.20 3.18 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 131.81 137.08 142.47 147.99 153.63 159.37 165.21 171.14 177.14 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 102.58 104.18 105.78 107.37 108.97 110.55 112.13 113.70 115.25 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 163.87 157.58 151.61 145.95 140.60 135.53 130.74 126.21 121.94 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 12.01 11.87 11.74 11.64 11.55 11.48 11.42 11.37 11.33 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1799 1820 1839 1855 1869 1882 1892 1900 1907 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 829 796 765 737 712 688 666 646 627 drop m GWP (TAR) 648 654 660 666 671 677 683 688 694 F/(F + H) 0.620 0.597 0.575 0.555 0.535 0.517 0.500 0.483 0.468 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 116.8% 118.2% 119.4% 120.5% 121.4% 122.2% 122.9% 123.4% 123.9% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.1% 107.7% 108.2% 108.8% 109.3% 109.8% 110.3% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 66.9% 64.2% 61.8% 59.5% 57.4% 55.5% 53.7% 52.1% 50.6% pressure drop

TABLE 36 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 12% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 (% b/w) R-134a 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 (% b/w) R-152a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 (% b/w) R-1234ze 38 33 28 23 18 13 8 3 −2 (E) (% b/w) COMPARATIVE DATA Calculation 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45/ 12/45 results 134a R1234yf 5/38 10/33 15/28 20/23 25/18 30/13 35/8 40/3 45/−2 Pressure 5.79 5.24 5.66 5.66 5.67 5.67 5.68 5.70 5.71 5.72 5.74 ratio Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.3% 84.5% 84.6% 84.8% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% efficiency condenser K 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 glide Evaporator K 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 glide Evaporator ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.3 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 −1.2 inlet T Condenser ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.9 53.0 53.0 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.1 53.1 exit T Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 18.92 18.95 18.97 18.96 18.94 18.91 18.87 18.82 18.75 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.34 3.35 3.35 3.34 3.33 3.32 3.30 3.29 3.27 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 134.43 139.73 145.15 150.71 156.38 162.15 168.03 173.99 180.03 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 104.27 105.86 107.45 109.03 110.62 112.19 113.76 115.32 116.87 temperature Mass kg/hr 174.53 227.39 160.68 154.59 148.81 143.32 138.13 133.21 128.55 124.15 119.98 flow rate Volumetric m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.59 11.47 11.36 11.27 11.20 11.14 11.08 11.04 11.01 flow rate Volumetric kJ/ 1641 1540 1864 1884 1901 1916 1929 1940 1949 1956 1962 capacity m3 Pressure kPa/ 953 1239 789 758 730 704 681 659 638 619 602 drop m GWP (TAR) 659 665 671 676 682 688 693 699 705 F/(F + H) 0.616 0.593 0.572 0.552 0.532 0.514 0.497 0.481 0.466 Capacity 106.6% 100.0% 121.0% 122.3% 123.5% 124.4% 125.3% 126.0% 126.6% 127.0% 127.4% relative to 1234yf Relative 106.0% 100.0% 106.0% 106.5% 107.1% 107.6% 108.2% 108.7% 109.2% 109.7% 110.2% COP Relative  76.9% 100.0% 63.7% 61.2% 58.9% 56.8% 54.9% 53.2% 51.5% 50.0% 48.6% pressure drop

TABLE 37 Theoretical Performance Data of Selected R-32/R-152a/R-1234ze(E)/R-134a Blends Containing 15% R32 and 45% R134a R-32 (% b/w) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 R-134a (% b/w) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 R-152a (% b/w) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 R-1234ze (E) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 (% b/w) COMPARATIVE Calculation DATA 15/45/ 15/45/ 15/45/ 15/45/ 15/45/ 15/45/ 15/45/ results 134a R1234yf 5/35 10/30 15/25 20/20 25/15 30/10 35/5 Pressure ratio 5.79 5.24 5.64 5.64 5.65 5.66 5.67 5.68 5.70 Volumetric  83.6% 84.7% 84.6% 84.7% 84.9% 85.0% 85.1% 85.2% 85.3% efficiency condenser glide K 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Evaporator glide K 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 Evaporator inlet T ° C. 0.0 0.0 −1.5 −1.5 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 −1.4 Condenser exit T ° C. 55.0 55.0 52.7 52.7 52.8 52.8 52.9 52.9 52.9 Condenser bar 16.88 16.46 19.80 19.81 19.80 19.78 19.74 19.69 19.62 pressure Evaporator bar 2.92 3.14 3.51 3.51 3.51 3.50 3.48 3.46 3.44 pressure Refrigeration kJ/kg 123.76 94.99 138.26 143.60 149.08 154.68 160.41 166.24 172.17 effect COP 2.03 1.91 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 Discharge ° C. 99.15 92.88 106.76 108.33 109.90 111.48 113.05 114.61 116.17 temperature Mass flow rate kg/hr 174.53 227.39 156.23 150.42 144.89 139.64 134.66 129.93 125.46 Volumetric flow m3/hr 13.16 14.03 11.02 10.92 10.84 10.77 10.71 10.66 10.62 rate Volumetric kJ/m3 1641 1540 1960 1978 1993 2006 2017 2026 2033 capacity Pressure drop kPa/m 953 1239 735 707 683 660 638 619 601 GWP (TAR) 676 681 687 693 698 704 710 F/(F + H) 0.610 0.588 0.567 0.547 0.528 0.511 0.494 Capacity relative to 106.6% 100.0% 127.3% 128.5% 129.5% 130.3% 131.0% 131.6% 132.1% 1234yf Relative COP 106.0% 100.0% 105.9% 106.5% 107.0% 107.6% 108.1% 108.6% 109.1% Relative  76.9% 100.0% 59.3% 57.1% 55.1% 53.2% 51.5% 49.9% 48.5% pressure drop 

1. A heat transfer composition comprising trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R-1234ze(E)), difluoromethane (R-32) and 1,1-difluoroethane (R-152a).
 2. A composition according to claim 1 comprising up to about 25% by weight R-32.
 3. A composition according to claim 1 comprising up to about 45% by weight R-152a.
 4. A composition according to claim 1 comprising from about 5 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 10 to about 45% by weight of R-152a and from about 43 to about 85% by weight R-1234ze(E).
 5. A composition according to claim 1 comprising from about 8 to about 12% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 10% by weight R-152a, and from about 78 to about 87% by weight R-1234ze(E).
 6. A composition according to claim 1 consisting essentially of R-32, R-152a and R-1234ze(E).
 7. A composition according to claim 1 further comprising 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (R-134a).
 8. A composition according to claim 7 comprising up to about 50% by weight of R-134a.
 9. A composition according to claim 8 comprising from about 2 to about 15% by weight R-32, from about 5 to about 45% by weight R-152a, from about 25 to about 50% R-134a, and from about 5 to about 70% by weight R-1234ze(E).
 10. A composition according to claim 7, consisting essentially of R-32, R-152a, R-1234ze(E) and R-134a.
 11. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition has a GWP of less than 1000, preferably less than
 150. 12. A composition according claim 1, wherein the temperature glide is less than about 10K, preferably less than about 5K.
 13. A composition according claim 1, wherein the composition has a volumetric refrigeration capacity within about 15%, preferably within about 10% of the existing refrigerant that it is intended to replace.
 14. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is less flammable than R-32 alone, R-152a alone or R-1234yf alone.
 15. A composition according to claim 14 wherein the composition has: (a) a higher flammable limit; (b) a higher ignition energy; and/or (c) a lower flame velocity compared to R-32 alone, R-152a alone or R-1234yf alone.
 16. A composition according to claim 1 which has a fluorine ratio (F/(F+H)) of from about 0.42 to about 0.7, preferably from about 0.44 to about 0.67.
 17. A composition according to claim 1 which is non-flammable.
 18. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition has a cycle efficiency within about 5% of the existing refrigerant that it is intended to replace.
 19. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition has a compressor discharge temperature within about 15K, preferably within about 10K, of the existing refrigerant that it is intended to replace.
 20. A composition comprising a lubricant and a composition according to claim
 1. 21. A composition according to claim 20, wherein the lubricant is selected from mineral oil, silicone oil, polyalkyl benzenes (PABs), polyol esters (POEs), polyalkylene glycols (PACs), polyalkylene glycol esters (PAG esters), polyvinyl ethers (PVEs), poly (alpha-olefins) and combinations thereof.
 22. A composition according to claim 20 further comprising a stabilizer.
 23. A composition according to claim 22, wherein the stabilizer is selected from diene-based compounds, phosphates, phenol compounds and epoxides, and mixtures thereof.
 24. A composition comprising a flame retardant and a composition according to claim
 1. 25. A composition according to claim 24, wherein the flame retardant is selected from the group consisting of tri-(2-chloroethyl)-phosphate, (chloropropyl) phosphate, tri-(2,3-dibromopropyl)-phosphate, tri-(1,3-dichloropropyl)-phosphate, diammonium phosphate, various halogenated aromatic compounds, antimony oxide, aluminum trihydrate, polyvinyl chloride, a fluorinated iodocarbon, a fluorinated bromocarbon, trifluoro iodomethane, perfluoroalkyl amines, bromo-fluoroalkyl amines and mixtures thereof.
 26. A composition according to claim 1 which is a refrigerant composition.
 27. A heat transfer device containing a composition as defined in claim
 1. 28. Use of a composition defined in claim 1 in a heat transfer device.
 29. A heat transfer device according to claim 27 which is a refrigeration device.
 30. A heat transfer device according to claim 29 which is selected from group consisting of automotive air conditioning systems, residential air conditioning systems, commercial air conditioning systems, residential refrigerator systems, residential freezer systems, commercial refrigerator systems, commercial freezer systems, chiller air conditioning systems, chiller refrigeration systems, and commercial or residential heat pump systems.
 31. A heat transfer device according to claim 29 which contains a compressor.
 32. A blowing agent comprising a composition as defined in claim
 1. 33. A foamable composition comprising one or more components capable of forming foam and a composition as defined in claim 1, wherein the one or more components capable of forming foam are selected from polyurethanes, thermoplastic polymers and resins, such as polystyrene, and epoxy resins, and mixtures thereof.
 34. A foam obtainable from the foamable composition as defined in claim
 33. 35. A foam according to claim 34 comprising a composition as defined in claim
 2. 36. A sprayable composition comprising material to be sprayed and a propellant comprising a composition as defined in claim
 1. 37. A method for cooling an article which comprises condensing a composition as defined in claim 1 and thereafter evaporating the composition in the vicinity of the article to be cooled.
 38. A method for heating an article which comprises condensing a composition as defined in claim 1 in the vicinity of the article to be heated and thereafter evaporating the composition.
 39. A method for extracting a substance from biomass comprising contacting biomass with a solvent comprising a composition as defined in claim 1, and separating the substance from the solvent.
 40. A method of cleaning an article comprising contacting the article with a solvent comprising a composition as defined in claim
 1. 41. A method of extracting a material from an aqueous solution comprising contacting the aqueous solution with a solvent comprising a composition as defined in claim 1, and separating the substance from the solvent.
 42. A method for extracting a material from a particulate solid matrix comprising contacting the particulate solid matrix with a solvent comprising a composition as defined in claim 1, and separating the material from the solvent.
 43. A mechanical power generation device containing a composition as defined in claim
 1. 44. A mechanical power generating device according to claim 43 which is adapted to use a Rankine Cycle or modification thereof to generate work from heat.
 45. A method of retrofitting a heat transfer device comprising the step of removing an existing heat transfer fluid, and introducing a composition as defined in claim
 1. 46. A method of claim 45 wherein the heat transfer device is a refrigeration device.
 47. A method according to claim 46 wherein the heat transfer device is an air conditioning system.
 48. A method for reducing the environmental impact arising from the operation of a product comprising an existing compound or composition, the method comprising replacing at least partially the existing compound or composition with a composition as defined in claim
 1. 49. A method for preparing a composition as defined in claim 1, the method comprising introducing R-1243ze(E), R-32, and R-152a, and optionally a lubricant, a stabilizer and/or a flame retardant, into a heat transfer device containing an existing heat transfer fluid which is R-134a.
 50. A method according to claim 49 comprising the step of removing at least some of the existing R-134a from the heat transfer device before introducing the R-1243ze(E), R-32, and R-152a, and optionally the lubricant, the stabilizer and/or the flame retardant.
 51. A method for generating greenhouse gas emission credit comprising (i) replacing an existing compound or composition with a composition as defined in claim 1, wherein the composition as defined in claim 1 has a lower GWP than the existing compound or composition; and (ii) obtaining greenhouse gas emission credit for said replacing step.
 52. A method of claim 51 wherein the use of the composition of the invention results in a lower Total Equivalent Warming Impact, and/or a lower Life-Cycle Carbon Production than is be attained by use of the existing compound or composition.
 53. A method of claim 51 carried out on a product from the fields of air-conditioning, refrigeration, heat transfer, blowing agents, aerosols or sprayable propellants, gaseous dielectrics, cryosurgery, veterinary procedures, dental procedures, fire extinguishing, flame suppression, solvents, cleaners, air horns, pellet guns, topical anesthetics, and expansion applications.
 54. A method according to claim 53 wherein the product is selected from a heat transfer device, a blowing agent, a foamable composition, a sprayable composition, a solvent or a mechanical power generation device.
 55. A method according to claim 54 wherein the product is a heat transfer device.
 56. A method according to claim 51 wherein the existing compound or composition is a heat transfer composition.
 57. A method according to claim 56 wherein the heat transfer composition is a refrigerant selected from R-134a, R-1234yf and R-152a. 